In a recent paper Xian-Jin Li showed that the Riemann Hypothesis holds if and only if \* n = \ [1&(1&1Â\) n ] has \* n >0 for n=1, 2, 3, ... where \ runs over the complex zeros of the Riemann zeta function. We show that Li's criterion follows as a consequence of a general set of inequalities for an
✦ LIBER ✦
Sharpenings of Li's Criterion for the Riemann Hypothesis
✍ Scribed by André Voros
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 343 KB
- Volume
- 9
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1385-0172
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Complements to Li's Criterion for the Ri
✍
Enrico Bombieri; Jeffrey C. Lagarias
📂
Article
📅
1999
🏛
Elsevier Science
🌐
English
⚖ 131 KB
Toward Verification of the Riemann Hypot
✍
Mark W. Coffey
📂
Article
📅
2005
🏛
Springer Netherlands
🌐
English
⚖ 482 KB
A criterion for the Generalized Riemann
✍
Jin Hong Li
📂
Article
📅
2009
🏛
Institute of Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Scien
🌐
English
⚖ 187 KB
Equivalents of the Riemann hypothesis
✍
Hidehiko Mishou; Hirofumi Nagoshi
📂
Article
📅
2006
🏛
Springer
🌐
English
⚖ 78 KB
On the Riemann Hypothesis for the Charac
✍
Daqing Wan
📂
Article
📅
1996
🏛
Elsevier Science
🌐
English
⚖ 476 KB
On Beurling′s Real Variable Reformulatio
✍
L Baezduarte
📂
Article
📅
1993
🏛
Elsevier Science
🌐
English
⚖ 623 KB
Let \(\rho(x)\) be the fractional part of \(x, B\) is the linear space of functions \(\sum_{1 \leqslant k \leqslant n} a_{k} \rho\left(\theta_{k} / x\right), \theta_{k} \in(0,1], \sum a_{k} \theta_{k}=0, n\) any positive integer. For \(p \in(1,2]\) Beurling proved that \(\zeta(s) \neq 0\) in \(\math