✦ LIBER ✦

Sharon Bertsch McGrayne.The Theory That Would Not Die: How Bayes' Rule Cracked the Enigma Code, Hunted Down Russian Submarines, and Emerged Triumphant from Two Centuries of Controversy

✍ Scribed by Kidwell, Peggy Aldrich; Kidwell, Mark E.

Book ID: 124255287
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Year: 2012
Tongue: English
Weight: 102 KB
Volume: 103
Category: Article
ISSN: 0021-1753
DOI: 10.1086/666402

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

The Theory That Would Not Die: How Bayes

The Theory That Would Not Die: How Bayes’ Rule Cracked the Enigma Code, Hunted Down Russian Submarines, and Emerged Triumphant from Two Centuries of Controversy by Sharon Bertsch McGrayne

✍ Christian P. Robert 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 558 KB

The Theory That Would Not Die: How Bayes

The Theory That Would Not Die: How Bayes’ Rule Cracked the Enigma Code, Hunted Down Russian Submarines and Emerged Triumphant from Two Centuries of Controversy. by McGrayne, Sharon Bertsch

✍ Howard Wainer; Sam Savage 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 685 KB

Bayes’ rule, medical genetics and the wi

Bayes’ rule, medical genetics and the wider world. A review of: the theory that would not die. How Bayes’ rule cracked the Enigma code, hunted down Russian submarines, and emerged triumphant from two centuries of controversy: by Sharon Bertsch McGrayne

✍ Harper, Peter S. 📂 Article 📅 2013 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 170 KB

The Theory That Would Not Die: How Bayes

The Theory That Would Not Die: How Bayes’ Rule Cracked the Enigma Code, Hunted Down Russian Submarines, and Emerged Triumphant from Two Centuries of Controversy

✍ Shostak, Stanley 📂 Article 📅 2013 🏛 Taylor and Francis Group 🌐 English ⚖ 173 KB

The Theory That Would Not Die: How Bayes' Rule Cracked the Enigma Code, Hunted Submarines, and Emerged Triumphant

✍ McGrayne, Sharon Bertsch 📂 Fiction 📅 2011 🏛 Yale University Press 🌐 English ⚖ 495 KB

Bayes' rule appears to be a straightforward, one-line theorem: by updating our initial beliefs with objective new information, we get a new and improved belief. To its adherents, it is an elegant statement about learning from experience. To its opponents, it is subjectivity run amok. In the first-e