## Abstract This article examines the effects of knowledge sharing or endogenous spillovers among R&D consortia participants on R&D competition when R&D enhances a firm's absorptive capacity. A three‐stage model illustrates how different compositions of R&D consortia affect endogenous spillover rat
Shared knowledge, “glitches,” and product development performance
✍ Scribed by David G. Hoopes; Steven Postrel
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 198 KB
- Volume
- 20
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0143-2095
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Much recent thought in strategy has stressed the importance of organizational integration for competitive advantage. Empirical studies of product development have supported this emphasis by correlating integrating practices and superior performance. We propose, from a resourcebased or capability view, that this correlation results from integration leading to patterns of shared knowledge among firm members, with the shared knowledge constituting a resource underlying product development capability. To explore this connection, we examine the product development efforts of a scientific software company. We define the 'glitch' as a costly error possible only because knowledge was not shared, and measure the influence of glitches on firm performance. At this company, gaps in shared knowledge did cause the company to incur significant excess costs. We also identify a set of 'syndromes' that can lead to glitches, and measure the relative importance of these syndromes. The glitch concept may offer a general tool for practical measurement of the marginal benefits of shared knowledge.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Although knowledge sharing is an important element in this process, little attention has been paid to this field. The purpose of this study was to explore knowledge-sharing practices in a development project in a pharmaceutical company in Denmark. A case study was carried out. Semi-structured interv
## Abstract Focusing on product development, this study extends the understanding of the environment‐strategy framework and investigates the relative effect of two environmental variables, dynamism and complexity, on the product development knowledge strategy. Adopting a knowledge‐based view, and a
Numerous projects are considered complex because of the number of stakeholders, the diversity of skills, and the uncertainty involved, requiring accurate information retrieval and management of the social interactions between different participants leading to efficient knowledge sharing. This paper