Predictions of future sexual oending have been mandated by various ``Sexual Predator'' commitment laws, despite historical arguments that clinicians are frequently inaccurate and over-predict violence. The basis for those arguments has been the perspective that sexual recidivism is a relatively rare
Sexual predator commitment laws: lessons for law and the behavioral sciences
โ Scribed by Eric S. Janus
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2000
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 182 KB
- Volume
- 18
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0735-3936
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Sex oender commitment laws use a mental health commitment model to lock up the most dangerous'' sex oenders after their prison sentences expire. In Kansas v. Hendricks, the United States Supreme Court rejected the major constitutional challenges to these laws. The Hendricks case clariยฎes important ambiguities about the use of civil commitment to enforce police power'' interests, as opposed to parens patriae'' interests. Hendricks also clariยฎes the role of treatment'' in justifying civil commitment. While there remain some important legal issues to be resolved, the future direction of sex oender commitment schemes will turn most signiยฎcantly on policy decisions. The behavioral sciences can play an important role in shaping these decisions. The most signiยฎcant questions concern whether expensive commitment programs are the most eective use of scarce treatment and supervision dollars. Additional research should be directed to improving dynamic predictors of recidivism, operationalizing inability to control'' standards, judging the social meaning'' of commitment laws, and assessing the potential treatment disincentives of these laws.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Ewing, Alan Felthous, and I are pleased to announce some new directions for the journal beginning in 1999. The new directions represent an expansion of what BS&L has to oer its readership. The ยฎrst change has to do with numbers. Volume 17 will include ยฎve issues, one more than we have oered in the
Behavioral-science-and-law scholarship suffers from the lack of many activities examining issues from a comparative or cross-cultural perspective. Although U.S. contributions tend to be the most insular, the problem applies to virtually all behavioral-science-and-law endeavors. This special perspect
This paper discusses speciยฎc behavioral research needs by law enforcement and justice systems to guide forensic decision-making in areas of targeted violence. Continuing incidents of stalking, workplace violence, and threats to public ยฎgures underscore the importance of developing empirically based