๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Serial MR neuroimaging: Comparison at 3T and 1.5T

โœ Scribed by B. Sneller; M.A. Dresner; R.A. Heckemann; J.V. Hajnal; DL. G. Hill

Book ID
118461809
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2005
Tongue
English
Weight
64 KB
Volume
1
Category
Article
ISSN
1552-5260

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Neuroimaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: Compari
Neuroimaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: Comparison of oxygenation-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging
โœ Gunnar Krรผger; Andreas Kastrup; Gary H. Glover ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 565 KB

## Abstract Noise properties, the signalโ€toโ€noise ratio (SNR), contrastโ€toโ€noise ratio (CNR), and signal responses were compared during functional activation of the human brain at 1.5 and 3.0 T. At the higher field spiral gradientโ€echo (GRE) brain images revealed an average gain in SNR of 1.7 in fu

A comparison of cardiac 31P MRS at 1.5 a
A comparison of cardiac 31P MRS at 1.5 and 3 T
โœ Damian J. Tyler; Lucy E. Hudsmith; Kieran Clarke; Stefan Neubauer; Matthew D. Ro ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2008 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 146 KB
MR lymphangiography using dendrimer-base
MR lymphangiography using dendrimer-based contrast agents: A comparison at 1.5T and 3.0T
โœ Yukihiro Hama; Marcelino Bernardo; Celeste A.S. Regino; Yoshinori Koyama; Martin ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 755 KB

## Abstract Most macromolecular contrast agents (CAs) show lower r~1~ and higher r~2~ relaxivities at 3.0T than at 1.5T. MR lymphangiography in mice using a macromolecular G6 dendrimerโ€based CA was serially performed and compared at both 1.5T and 3.0T. The r~1~ and r~2~ relaxivities of the G6 CA we

MR Colonography: 1.5T versus 3T
MR Colonography: 1.5T versus 3T
โœ Lauenstein, Thomas C.; Saar, Bettina; Martin, Diego R. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 767 KB