Sensitive measures of the nutritional status of children with cancer in hospital and in the field
β Scribed by Bernadette M. D. Brennan
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- French
- Weight
- 54 KB
- Volume
- 78
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0020-7136
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Sensitive measures of nutritional status exist. Initial assessment must include some measure that is independent of tumour mass, particularly in children with large solid tumours. Arm anthropometry, including triceps and biceps skinfold thickness (SFT), and mid-upper-arm circumference (MUAC) are ideal in this situation, but MUAC is probably the simplest measure to use. In the clinical setting, a direct measure of fat-free body mass (FFBM) does not exist, but bio-electrical impedance (BIA) measures FFBM indirectly, and has many advantages, in particular its ease of use and immediate results. The BIA analyzer is portable and hence can be used in the field as well as by the bedside. Serum proteins and insulin-like growth factors are insufficiently sensitive as nutritional indices and have only a minor role in nutritional assessment.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
We read with interest the paper of Yu et al. [1], "Nutri-early diagnosis of malnutrition in pediatric cancer patients. tional Status of Children With Leukemia," which appeared in Medical and Pediatric Oncology, and contribute Yu et al. [1] reported that prealbumin is the most sensitive indicator of
## BACKGROUND. Malnutrition has been recognized as a poor prognostic indicator for cancer treatment-related morbidity and mortality in general, and it is reported to affect 30 -50% of all patients with head and neck cancer. In this study, the correlation of nutritional status with 3-year survival