Response set and the Eysenck Personality
โ
M. J. Stones
๐
Article
๐
1976
๐
John Wiley and Sons
๐
English
โ 275 KB
๐ 1 views
difference. The remaining items were nonsignificant. Three of the repetitions (15/314, 16/315, and 37/302) differed on the .01 level for the female Ss, and it is noteworthy that these were the same items on which the males varied. One female pair (21/308) differed on the .05 level, and all the other