✦ LIBER ✦

Self-collected versus clinician-collected sampling for sexually transmitted infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

✍ Scribed by Taylor, Darlene; Lunny, Carole; Wong, Tom; Gilbert, Mark; Li, Neville; Lester, Richard; Krajden, Mel; Hoang, Linda; Ogilvie, Gina

Book ID: 121616598
Publisher: BioMed Central
Year: 2013
Tongue: English
Weight: 186 KB
Volume: 2
Category: Article
ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-93

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Are self-collected samples comparable to

Are self-collected samples comparable to physician-collected cervical specimens for human papillomavirus DNA testing? A systematic review and meta-analysis

✍ Patrick Petignat; Daniel L. Faltin; Ilan Bruchim; Martin R. Tramèr; Eduardo L. F 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 290 KB

Comparative effectiveness and acceptabil

Comparative effectiveness and acceptability of home-based and clinic-based sampling methods for sexually transmissible infections screening in females aged 14–50 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis

✍ Odesanmi, Tolulope Y.; Wasti, Sharada P.; Odesanmi, Omolola S.; Adegbola, Omolol 📂 Article 📅 2013 🏛 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Or 🌐 English ⚖ 485 KB

Letter to the Editor concerning Petignat

Letter to the Editor concerning Petignat et al.'s “Are self-collected samples comparable to physician-collected cervical specimens for human papillomavirus DNA testing? A systematic review and meta-analysis.” Gynecol Oncol 2007;105(2): 530–535

✍ Robert G. Pretorius; Jerome L. Belinson 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 61 KB