Mice selected for high (H6) and low (L6) 6-week body weight and a randombred control population (C1) were characterized for rate, composition and efficiency of growth. Individual body weights were obtained from birth to 8 weeks of age on 682 mice representative of the three lines. Individual whole c
Selection for different growth parameters in laboratory mice and its correlated effects on body composition and organ weights
✍ Scribed by Bünger, L. ;Remus, N. ;Roschlau, D.
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1985
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 624 KB
- Volume
- 29
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0027-769X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Body composition and organ weights wcre determined in male mice sampled from 4 different lines of a selection experiment: DU-6P (selected for high protein amount), DU-6 (selected for high body weight), DU-6 + LB (selected for an index combining body weight and endurance fitness) and DU-K (unselectcd control line). Selection was carried out under the conditions of ad libitum feeding and standardization of litter size at birth. I n all 3 selection lines a significant direct selection response was shown. While fat in lines DU-6P and DLJ-6 + LB remained normal, it increased after selection for body weight (DU-6) significantly. U p to generation I3 the average increase of fat was 0.32"< per generation. Investigations on 28 to 80 days old inice showed. that males of this line were fatter before, at and after the age of selection (42 days). After 9 generations the body weight of selected mice was significantly increased by 23 to 2 9 " ~. The absolute organ weights of hearts. livers and kidneys were also significantly higher. while the relative weights of hearts and kidneysdecreased. The relative liver weights were in the selected lines higher, but only the difference DU-6 vs. DU-K was significant.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Spot size in descendants from the Goodale white-spotted stock of mice responded to selection for increased spot size. The realized heritability estimate was 0.52. However, no correlated response of reproduction to spot size selection was found in the present study, nor was there any correlated respo