𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Selection and description of cancer clinical trials participants—Science or happenstance?

✍ Scribed by G. Marie Swanson; John C. Bailar III


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2002
Tongue
English
Weight
85 KB
Volume
95
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Background:

The selection of clinical trials participants is a critical step in study design, because it affects the generalizability of recommendations made on the basis of trial results and public acceptance of medical research. the authors assessed the heterogeneity of subgroups in cancer treatment and prevention trials and the analysis of subgroups in the evaluation of trial outcomes.

Methods:

The authors reviewed published reports (1990-2000) of cancer prevention and treatment trials from 11 journals. they report here on all phase iii cancer treatment and prevention trials that had at least 100 participants and were conducted among adults in the united states. a structured abstract was developed and used to extract data from the 261 published reports. descriptive summaries of the abstracted data provided the information included in this systematic review.

Results:

Age and gender of study participants were reported in more than 90% of these trials, whereas fewer than 30% of the trials reported race or ethnicity. gender was reported as an explicit criterion for participant selection primarily in studies of gender specific malignancies. race and ethnicity were reported as explicit selection criteria for participant selection for five of the prevention trials and for none of the cancer treatment trials. the 105 treatment trials that reported including both men and women had 42,355 participants, and 38.6% of those participants were women. the 26 prevention trials that reported including both men and women had 73,995 participants, and 34.7% of those participants were women. fifty-seven treatment trials reported participant ethnic diversity: there were 45,815 participants, with 10.5% african-american participants and with less than 1% hispanic, asian, or native american participants. seventeen prevention trials reported participant ethnic diversity: there were 91,741 participants, with 5.5% african-american participants, 1.7% hispanic participants, and less than 1% asian or native american participants.

Conclusions:

Cancer treatment and prevention trial reports provide scant information about participant race and ethnicity. such studies use participant selection criteria that do not define diverse subgroups, and few subgroup analyses are conducted. improvements in the selection, reporting, and analysis of clinical trials participants are needed.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Generalizability of cancer clinical tria
✍ Linda S. Elting; Catherine Cooksley; B. Nebiyou Bekele; Michael Frumovitz; Eleni 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 140 KB

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND The generalizability of clinical trial results is questionable, because fewer than 5% of cancer patients participate. The authors examined the comparability of clinical trial participants and nonparticipants and the potential impact of differences. ## METHODS A retrospe

Age disparity between a cancer populatio
✍ Akiko Hori; Taro Shibata; Masahiro Kami; Eiji Kusumi; Hiroto Narimatsu; Yukiko K 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 82 KB

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND. Underrepresentation of older patients in cancer clinical trials has been reported previously. ## METHODS. To evaluate disparities in age between actual cancer patients and those enrolled in clinical trials, the authors examined all the review reports of the Pharmaceuti

Influence of tumor type, disease status,
✍ Maurie Markman; Judith Petersen; Robert Montgomery 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 72 KB

## Abstract There is limited information available regarding the reasons cancer patients decide to enter clinical trials. To explore this issue, aggregate responses to the question, “Are you interested in learning about clinical trials for your condition?” obtained from >115,000 cancer patients (or

The clinical significance of tumor cells
✍ Fikret Arpaci; Mukerrem Safali; Ahmet Ozet; Ali U. Ural; Turker Cetin; Mustafa O 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 218 KB

## Abstract The purpose of this study is to determine the presence of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow or apheresis product, and also to evaluate the clinical significance of contaminated products and the efficacy of CD34^+^ selection and high‐dose chemotherapy in patients with Stage III bre