๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Selecting a humanly understandable knowledge representation for reasoning about knowledge

โœ Scribed by Anthony S. Maida


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1985
Weight
621 KB
Volume
22
Category
Article
ISSN
0020-7373

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Three formalisms for representing knowledge about knowledge are briefly examined from the point of view of allowing a computer program to communicate its knowledge to a human. The first two formalisms are philosophically motivated and the last is psychologically motivated. Although all three formalisms are adequate for the purposes of valid inference in this problem domain, it is argued that the psychologically motivated formalism is the most useful of the three for the purposes of man-machine communication. The first two formalisms express more distinctions than a human would, when reasoning about the same problem, whereas the last formalism express the right number of distinctions.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A knowledge representation perspective:
โœ Philippe Besnard; Els Laenens ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1994 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 912 KB

Paraconsistent logics are examined as an approach to knowledge representation devoted to the formalization of reasoning in the presence of contradictions. The adequacy of paraconsistent logics in such a perspective is described both on a general level and on a more specific level: discussion involve