𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Seismic hazard assessments for two test areas — ‘Southern Italy’ and ‘Belgium—The Netherlands—Germany’

✍ Scribed by Vladimír Schenk; Zdeňka Schenková; František Mantlík; Pavel Kottnauer

Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Year
1989
Tongue
English
Weight
976 KB
Volume
2
Category
Article
ISSN
0921-030X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

Within the activity of the ESC Subcommission 8 'Engineering Seismology', Project TERESA, seismic hazard calculations have been performed for two areas of a different earthquake activity. Fundamental seismological data (earthquake catalogues, macroseismic observations and maps) and some additional geological information were analyzed and processed to prepare inputs for hazard computations. Great attention has been paid to verifying the reliability of the input data. Seismic hazards obtained for five sites of the region of high seismic activity (Sannio-Matese, southern Italy) and six sites of the region of low seismic activity (Brabant Massif and northern Rhine, Belgium-The Netherlands-Germany) are presented and discussed.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Assessment of seismic hazard for the San
Assessment of seismic hazard for the Sannio-Matese area of Southern Italy — A summary
✍ M. S. Barbano; J. J. Egozcue; M. García Fernández; A. Kijko; J. Lapajne; D. Maye 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 640 KB

The working group on 'Test \_Regions for E\_valuation of Methods for Seismic Hazard Assessment in Europe (TERESA)', consisted of 15 members from 10 different European countries. Methods and experience gathered in these countries have been compared and discussed for two test areas in Europe: the Sann

Seismic hazard computations for regions
Seismic hazard computations for regions with low earthquake activity — A case study for the Belgium, The Netherlands and NW Germany area
✍ Theo Crook; Vladimír Schenk; M. S. Barbano; F. Colombo; J. J. Egozcue; M. García 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 350 KB

The algorithms to evaluate seismic hazard, used and/or developed by five teams participating in the TERESA project, applied to the low seismicity area 'Belgium, The Netherlands and NW Germany' are compared. The main differences in the results can be explained by the majority criterion of Egozcue et