Secondary non-response due to antibody formation in a child after three injections of botulinum toxin B into the salivary glands
✍ Scribed by Steffen Berweck; A Sebastian Schroeder; Seung-Hee Lee; Hans Bigalke; Florian Heinen
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 57 KB
- Volume
- 49
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0012-1622
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Botulinum toxin (BTX) offers a new treatment option to reduce drooling in adults and children. Antibody formation against BTX is known to be one reason for clinical secondary non‐response to this treatment. This is a case report on the development of secondary non‐response to BTX type B (BTX‐B) in a 15‐year‐old male, with bilateral dyskinetic cerebral palsy (Gross Motor Function Classification System Level IV) with additional learning disability* and microcephaly, treated for the indication of drooling. After three successful treatment sessions, the fourth and fifth injections showed no clinical response. This was associated with the presence of antibodies against BTX‐B as determined using the mouse diaphragm assay. Thus, formation of neutralizing antibodies against BTX‐B appears to be an important issue, not only in patients treated for cervical dystonia but also in children treated for drooling. Subsequent injections with an adequate dose of BTX type A (BTX‐A) did not show any clinical response either, although no antibodies to BTX‐A were detected. Besides the unanswered questions of dosing and distribution, a second possible explanation could be that BTX‐B gave rise to non‐neutralizing antibodies that cross‐react with BTX‐A. The resulting immune complexes could be taken up by phagocytes and, thereby, impede clinical response.