𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Secondary motions of the knee during weight bearing and non-weight bearing activities

✍ Scribed by Chris O Dyrby; Thomas P Andriacchi


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
699 KB
Volume
22
Category
Article
ISSN
0736-0266

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that during a weight bearing activity such as walking, a dynamic range (envelope of motion) exists in the relationship between the secondary knee motions (anterior‐posterior (AP) translation, internalexternal (IE) rotation, and abduction‐adduction (Ab‐Adduction)) and knee flexion angle. In addition differences in the envelope of motion between a weight bearing and non‐weight bearing activity were tested. The hypothesis was evaluated by testing for differences (offsets) in secondary displacements at specific knee flexion angles during the walking cycle and seated leg extension (nonweight bearing). Kinematic measurements were obtained using a previously developed point cluster technique to analyze the sixdegrees of freedom movement of the knee. During walking, phase plots of the IE rotation and AP translation versus knee flexion demonstrated significant offsets from one phase of the gait cycle to another at the same flexion angle. During the non‐weight bearing activity, no significant offset in the secondary movement was found; the knee followed the same pathway of motion during the flexion and extension phase of this activity. The characteristics of the secondary motions during walking indicated that secondary knee movements are caused by the external forces (muscle, inertial and gravitational) that act on the knee during the various phases of the walking cycle. The boundaries of the envelope appear to reflect the characteristics of the passive restraints. The weight bearing secondary motion AP and IE rotation seen during a walking activity demonstrated an envelope of dynamic laxity that could potentially be used to evaluate functional instabilities at the knee. © 2003 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Sex differences in coupled knee motions
✍ Sandra J. Shultz; Bruce D. Beynnon; Randy J. Schmitz 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 178 KB

## Abstract Knee ligament injuries frequently happen when the joint transitions from non‐weight bearing (NWB) to weight bearing (WB). To gain insight into the mechanism that produces these injuries, physically active females (__N__ = 41) and males (__N__ = 39) underwent measurement of coupled tibio

Knee kinematics in medial osteoarthritis
✍ Satoshi Hamai; Taka-aki Moro-oka; Hiromasa Miura; Takeshi Shimoto; Hidehiko Higa 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 170 KB

## Abstract Dynamic knee kinematics were analyzed for medial osteoarthritic (OA) knees in three activities, including two types of maximum knee flexion. Continuous x‐ray images of kneeling, squatting, and stair climbing motions were taken using a large flat panel detector. CT‐derived bone models we

In vivo kinematics of the ACL during wei
✍ Guoan Li; Louis E. DeFrate; Harry E. Rubash; Thomas J. Gill 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 721 KB

## Abstract No study has investigated the three‐dimensional morphological changes of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) during functional activities in vivo. The purpose of this study was to analyze the elongation, rotation (twist), and orientation of the ACL during weight‐bearing flexion in five