โ Scribed by Martin A. Pomerantz
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
The secondary electron emission from alkaline-earth oxide-coated cathodes has been investigated under both continuous and pulsed bombardment. Various factors affecting the yield, such as dependence upon primary voltage, collecting voltage, temperature, time, and angle of incidence, are noted, and the present state of the theory is discussed. Experiments have been performed with three types of apparatus. Yield vs. Energy data reveal values of of 4-7 at room temperature, with a more or less flat maximum at approximately I,OOO volts primary energy. The yield increases with temperature in an exponential manner, and plots of log A~ (i.e. ~K ยฐ -~300ยฐK.) vs. I/T give strffight lines. Values of QI between 0.9 -1.5 eV. are generally indicated, and from extrapolation of these curves, yields exceeding IOO at 85o ยฐ C. are deduced. The secondary emission depends upon the degree of activation, and increases with enhancement of the thermionic emission characteristics. Short-time effects such as growth or decay of secondary current after the onset of primary bombardment or persistence after the cessation of bombardment have not been observed, and values of yield obtained by pulsed methods are in accord with those obtained under D.C. conditions. Tail phenomena reported by J. B. Johnson and interpreted as "enhanced thermionic emission" from oxidecoated cathodes become manifest only under experimental conditions characterized by certain space-charge effects, and have been effectively simulated by bombarding a tantalum target adjacent to an electron-emitting tungsten filament. Various measurements of the energy distribution of secondary electrons as a function of primary voltage and temperature have been obtained. It was observed that the average energy of the secondary electrons decreases with temperature at a rate which more than compensates for the increase in the number of secondaries emitted per incident primary. The mechanism of the observed dependence of yield upon temperature is not well understood. Various alternative explanations are discussed and, in the light of the present state of our knowledge, regarded as untenable.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES