Alternative approaches to the widely known pignistic transformation of belief functions are presented and analyzed. Pignistic, cautious, proportional, and disjunctive probabilistic transformations are examined from the point of view of their interpretation, of decision making and ~from the point of
Second-order probabilities and belief functions
β Scribed by Jonathan Baron
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Year
- 1987
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 544 KB
- Volume
- 23
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0040-5833
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
A second-order probability Q(P) may be understood as the probability that the true probability of something has the value P. "True" may be interpreted as the value that would be assigned if certain information were available, including information from reflection, calculation, other people, or ordinary evidence. A rule for combining evidence from two independent sources may be derived, if each source i provides a function Q,(P). Belief functions of the sort proposed by Shafer (1976) also provide a formula for combining independent evidence, Dempster's rule, and a way of representing ignorance of the sort that makes us unsure about the value of P. Dempster's rule is shown to be at best a special case of the rule derived in connection with second-order probabilities. Belief functions thus represent a restriction of a full Bayesian analysis.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES