๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Screening for NIDDM: increasing evidence that it is necessary Part 2: How should it be done?

โœ Scribed by Davies, M. J. ;Burden, A. C. ;Burden, M. L.

Book ID
104514632
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1997
Tongue
English
Weight
356 KB
Volume
14
Category
Article
ISSN
1357-8170

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Committee reports. Report on patent law
Committee reports. Report on patent law revision**The evidence in support of the Preambles and Resolutions and suggested additions to the copyright, patent and trade-mark laws contained in the first part of our report was not published in the May Journal owing to want of space. I am now sending you the remaining part of the report, by request, as it is considered quite necessary for the members of the Association to have in their hands before the next annual meeting, the entire document for consideration and study. It is believed that this will decidedly facilitate matters and save much time at the annual meeting which otherwise might be used up in unnecessary discussion of the subject.Your Committee wishes to again emphasize that fact that we have no desire to impose our personal views on the Association. The copyright and patent laws were designed to promote progress in science and the useful arts and the trade-mark laws to protect the public from fraud and imposition. It is generally conceded that the laws as now interpreted and applied fall short in accomplishing their purpose. It is therefore incumbent upon the A. Ph. A., representing the pharmacists of America, to suggest proper modifications of the law, of such kind as to secure the very important objects for which they were enacted.โ€”F. E. Stewarcth, Chairman.
๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1917 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier โš– 359 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views