<P>Kuhn and Feyerabend formulated the problem. Dilworth provides the solution.</P> <P>In this highly original and insightful book, Craig Dilworth answers all the questions raised by the incommensurability thesis. Logical empiricism cannot account for theory conflict. Popperianism cannot account for
Scientific Progress: A Study Concerning the Nature of the Relation Between Successive Scientific Theories
β Scribed by Craig Dilworth (auth.)
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Year
- 1994
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 254
- Series
- Synthese Library 153
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Table of Contents
Front Matter....Pages I-9
Introduction....Pages 11-13
The Deductive Model....Pages 14-17
The Basis of the Logical Empiricist Conception of Science....Pages 18-21
The Basis of the Popperian Conception of Science....Pages 22-29
The Logical Empiricist Conception of Scientific Progress....Pages 30-36
The Popperian Conception of Scientific Progress....Pages 37-51
Popper, Lakatos, and the Transcendence of the Deductive Model....Pages 52-59
Kuhn, Feyerabend, and Incommensurability....Pages 60-65
The Gestalt Model....Pages 66-76
The Perspectivist Conception of Science....Pages 77-99
Development of the Perspectivist Conception in the Context of the Kinetic Theory of Gases....Pages 100-117
The Set-Theoretic Conception of Science....Pages 118-132
Application of the Perspectivist Conception to the Views of Newton Kepler and Galileo....Pages 133-141
Back Matter....Pages 142-252
β¦ Subjects
Philosophy of Science; Epistemology; Metaphysics
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
<p><P>Kuhn and Feyerabend formulated the problem. Dilworth provides the solution.</P><P></P><P>In this highly original and insightful book, Craig Dilworth answers all the questions raised by the incommensurability thesis. Logical empiricism cannot account for theory conflict. Popperianism cannot acc
<p>For the philosopher interested in the idea of objective knowledge of the real world, the nature of science is of special importance, for science, and more particularly physics, is today considered to be paradigmatic in its affording of such knowledge. And no understandΒ ing of science is complete