๐”– Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

๐Ÿ“

Sartre, Foucault, and Historical Reason, Volume One: Toward an Existentialist Theory of History

โœ Scribed by Thomas R. Flynn


Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Year
2008
Tongue
English
Leaves
350
Category
Library

โฌ‡  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Sartre and Foucault were two of the most prominent and at times mutually antagonistic philosophical figures of the twentieth century. And nowhere are the antithetical natures of their existentialist and poststructuralist philosophies more apparent than in their disparate approaches to historical understanding.

A history, thought Foucault, should be a kind of map, a comparative charting of structural transformations and displacements. But for Sartre, authentic historical understanding demanded a much more personal and committed narrative, a kind of interpretive diary of moral choices and risks compelled by critical necessity and an exacting reality. Sartre's history, a rational history of individual lives and their intrinsic social worlds, was in essence immersed in biography.

In Volume One of this authoritative two-volume work, Thomas R. Flynn conducts a pivotal and comprehensive reconstruction of Sartrean historical theory, and provocatively anticipates the Foucauldian counterpoint to come in Volume Two.



๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Sartre, Foucault, and Historical Reason,
โœ Thomas R. Flynn ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐ŸŒ English

Sartre and Foucault were two of the most prominent and at times mutually antagonistic philosophical figures of the twentieth century. And nowhere are the antithetical natures of their existentialist and poststructuralist philosophies more apparent than in their disparate approaches to historical und

Sartre, Foucault, and Historical Reason,
โœ Thomas R. Flynn ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› University of Chicago Press ๐ŸŒ English

Sartre and Foucault were two of the most prominent and at times mutually antagonistic philosophical figures of the twentieth century. And nowhere are the antithetical natures of their existentialist and poststructuralist philosophies more apparent than in their disparate approaches to historical und

Sartre, Foucault, and Historical Reason,
โœ Thomas R. Flynn ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› University of Chicago Press ๐ŸŒ English

<div>Sartre and Foucault were two of the most prominent and at times mutually antagonistic philosophical figures of the twentieth century. And nowhere are the antithetical natures of their existentialist and poststructuralist philosophies more apparent than in their disparate approaches to historica

Sartre: Toward an Existentialist Theory
โœ Thomas R. Flynn ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2014 ๐Ÿ› University of Chicago Press ๐ŸŒ English

Sartre and Foucault were two of the most prominent and at times mutually antagonistic philosophical figures of the twentieth century. And nowhere are the antithetical natures of their existentialist and poststructuralist philosophies more apparent than in their disparate approaches to historical und

Sartre, Foucault, and Historical Reason,
โœ Thomas R. Flynn ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2005 ๐ŸŒ English

Sartre and Foucault were two of the most prominent and at times mutually antagonistic philosophical figures of the twentieth century. And nowhere are the antithetical natures of their existentialist and poststructuralist philosophies more apparent than in their disparate approaches to historical und

Sartre, Foucault, and Historical Reason,
โœ Thomas R. Flynn ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2005 ๐Ÿ› University Of Chicago Press ๐ŸŒ English

Sartre and Foucault were two of the most prominent and at times mutually antagonistic philosophical figures of the twentieth century. And nowhere are the antithetical natures of their existentialist and poststructuralist philosophies more apparent than in their disparate approaches to historical und