𝔖 Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

πŸ“

Sample Sizes for Clinical Trials

✍ Scribed by Steven A. Julious


Publisher
Chapman and Hall/CRC
Year
2023
Tongue
English
Leaves
421
Edition
2
Category
Library

⬇  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Sample Sizes for Clinical Trials, Second Edition is a practical book that assists researchers in their estimation of the sample size for clinical trials. Throughout the book there are detailed worked examples to illustrate both how to do the calculations and how to present them to colleagues or in protocols. The book also highlights some of the pitfalls in calculations as well as the key steps that lead to the final sample size calculation.

Features:

    • Comprehensive coverage of sample size calculations, including Normal, binary, ordinal, and survival outcome data
    • Covers superiority, equivalence, non-inferiority, bioequivalence and precision objectives for both parallel group and crossover designs
    • Highlights how trial objectives impact the study design with respect to both the derivation of sample formulae and the size of the study
    • Motivated with examples of real-life clinical trials showing how the calculations can be applied
    • New edition is extended with all chapters revised, some substantially, and four completely new chapters on multiplicity, cluster trials, pilot studies, and single arm trials

    The book is primarily aimed at researchers and practitioners of clinical trials and biostatistics, and could be used to teach a course on sample size calculations. The importance of a sample size calculation when designing a clinical trial is highlighted in the book. It enables readers to quickly find an appropriate sample size formula, with an associated worked example, complemented by tables to assist in the calculations.

    ✦ Table of Contents


    Cover
    Half Title
    Title Page
    Copyright Page
    Dedication
    Contents
    Preface
    Preface to the First Edition
    1. Introduction
    1.1. Background to Randomised Controlled Trials
    1.2. Types of Clinical Trial
    1.3. Assessing Evidence from Trials
    1.3.1. The Normal Distribution
    1.3.2. The Central Limit Theorem
    1.3.3. Frequentist Approaches
    1.3.3.1. Hypothesis Testing and Estimation
    1.3.3.2. Hypothesis Testing – Superiority Trials
    1.3.3.3. Statistical and Clinical Significance or Importance
    1.4. Sample Size Calculations for a Clinical Trial
    1.4.1. Why to Do a Sample Size Calculation?
    1.4.2. Why Not to Do a Sample Size Calculation?
    1.5. Superiority Trials
    1.5.1. CACTUS Example
    1.6. Equivalence Trials
    1.6.1. General Case
    1.6.2. Special Case of No Treatment Difference
    1.7. Worked Example
    1.8. Non-Inferiority Trials
    1.8.1. Worked Example
    1.9. As Good as or Better Trials
    1.9.1. A Test of Non-Inferiority and One-Sided Test of Superiority
    1.9.2. A Test of Non-Inferiority and Two-Sided Test of Superiority
    1.10. Assessment of Bioequivalence
    1.10.1. Justification for Log Transformation
    1.10.2. Rationale for Using Coefficients of Variation
    1.11. Estimation to a Given Precision
    1.12. Summary
    2. Seven Key Steps to Cook up a Sample Size
    2.1. Introduction
    2.2. Step 1: Deciding on the Trial Objective
    2.3. Step 2: Deciding on the Endpoint
    2.4. Step 3: Determining the Effect Size (or Margin)
    2.4.1. Estimands
    2.4.2. Quantifying an Effect Size
    2.4.3. Obtaining an Estimate of the Treatment Effect
    2.4.4. Worked Example with a Binary Endpoint
    2.4.5. Worked Example with Normal Endpoint
    2.4.6. Issues in Quantifying an Effect Size from Empirical Data
    2.4.7. Further Issues in Quantifying an Effect Size from Empirical Data
    2.4.8. A Worked Example Using the Anchor Method
    2.4.9. Choice of Equivalence or Non-Inferiority Limit
    2.4.9.1. Considerations for the Active Control
    2.4.9.2. Considerations for the Retrospective Placebo Control
    2.5. Step 4: Assessing the Population Variability
    2.5.1. Binary Data
    2.5.1.1. Worked Example of a Variable Control Response with Binary Data
    2.5.2. Normal Data
    2.5.2.1. Worked Example of Assessing Population Differences with Normal Data
    2.6. Step 5: Type I Error
    2.6.1. Superiority Trials
    2.6.2. Non-Inferiority and Equivalence Trials
    2.7. Step 6: Type II Error
    2.8. Step 7: Other Factors
    2.9. Summary
    3. Sample Sizes for Parallel Group Superiority Trials with Normal Data
    3.1. Introduction
    3.2. Sample Sizes Estimated Assuming the Population Variance to Be Known
    3.3. Worked Example 3.1
    3.3.1. Initial Wrong Calculation
    3.3.2. Correct Calculations
    3.3.3. Accounting for Dropout
    3.4. Worked Example 3.2
    3.5. Design Considerations
    3.5.1. Inclusion of Baselines or Covariates
    3.5.2. Post-Dose Measures Summarised by Summary Statistics
    3.5.3. Inclusion of Baseline or Covariates as Well as Post-Dose Measures Summarised by Summary Statistics
    3.6. Revisiting Worked Example 3.1
    3.6.1. Re-Investigating the Type II Error
    3.7. Sensitivity Analysis
    3.7.1. Worked Example 3.3
    3.8. Calculations Taking Account of the Imprecision of the Variance Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    3.8.1. Worked Example 3.4.
    3.9. Summary
    4. Sample Size Calculations for Superiority Cross-Over Trials with Normal Data
    4.1. Introduction
    4.2. Sample Sizes Estimated Assuming the Population Variance to Be Known
    4.2.1. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
    4.2.2. Paired t-tests
    4.2.3. Period Adjusted t-tests
    4.2.4. Summary of Statistical Analysis Approaches
    4.2.5. Sample Size Calculations
    4.2.6. Worked Example 4.1
    4.2.7. Worked Example 4.2
    4.2.8. Worked Example 4.3
    4.3. Sensitivity Analysis about the Variance Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    4.3.1. Worked Example 4.4
    4.4. Calculations Taking Account of the Imprecision of the Variance Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    4.5. Summary
    5. Sample Sizes for Cluster Randomised Trials
    5.1. Introduction
    5.2. Context of the Chapter
    5.3. Sample Size Calculations
    5.3.1. Quantifying the Effect of Clustering
    5.3.2. Sample Size Requirements for Cluster Randomised Designs
    5.3.2.1. Worked Example 5.1
    5.3.3. Sample Size Requirements for Cluster Trials with Baseline Data
    5.3.3.1. Worked Example 5.2 – Worked Example 5.1 Revisited
    5.4. Clustering in One-Arm of a Trial
    5.4.1. Worked Example 5.3
    5.4.2. Sample Size Requirements for Cluster Randomised Cross-Over Designs
    5.4.2.1. Worked Example 5.4
    5.5. Do Cluster Trials Need More People?
    5.5.1. Worked Example 5.5
    5.6. Stepped Wedge Trials
    5.6.1. Sample Size Calculations
    5.6.2. Worked Example 5.6 – Worked Example 5.1 Revisited Again
    5.7. Summary
    6. Allowing for Multiplicity in Sample Size Calculations for Clinical Trials
    6.1. Introduction
    6.2. Context of the Chapter
    6.3. Multiple Treatment Comparisons
    6.3.1. Multiplicity Adjustments for Independent Comparisons
    6.3.1.1. Bonferroni
    6.3.1.2. Hochberg Procedures
    6.3.1.3. Holm Procedures
    6.3.1.4. Gatekeeping through Sequential Testing
    6.3.2. Multiplicity Adjustments for Correlated Comparisons
    6.3.2.1. Hochberg Procedures
    6.3.2.2. Dunnett’s Test
    6.3.3. Sample Size Calculations Allowing for Multiplicity in the Endpoints
    6.3.4. Worked Example 6.1 – Three Endpoints for the Sample Size Estimation
    6.4. Allowing for Multiple Must-Win in Treatment Comparisons
    6.4.1. Sample Size Calculations for Multiple Must-Win Trials Ignoring the Multiplicity in Type II Error
    6.4.1.1 Worked Example 6.2 – Worked Example 6.1 Revisited as a Multiple Must-Win Trial but Ignoring the Multiplicity
    6.4.2. Sample Sizes Accounting for the Multiplicity in Type II Error with Two Endpoints
    6.4.2.1. Worked Example 6.3 – Worked Example 6.1 Revisited as a Multiple Must-Win Using Two Endpoints for the Sample Size Estimation
    6.4.3. Sample Sizes for Multiple Must-Win Trials with More Than Two Endpoints
    6.4.3.1. Worked Example 6.1 Revisited as a Multiple Must-Win Using Three Endpoints for the Sample Size Estimation
    6.4.3.2. Non-Constant Treatment Effects
    6.5. Summary
    7. Sample Size Calculations for Non-Inferiority Clinical Trials with Normal Data
    7.1. Introduction
    7.2. Parallel-Group Trials
    7.2.1. Sample Size Estimated Assuming the Population Variance to Be Known
    7.2.2. Non-Inferiority Versus Superiority Trials
    7.2.3. Worked Example 7.1
    7.2.4. Sensitivity Analysis about the Mean Difference Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    7.2.5. Worked Example 7.2
    7.2.6. Calculations Taking Account of the Imprecision of the Variance Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    7.3. Cross-Over Trials
    7.3.1. Sample Size Estimated Assuming the Population Variance to Be Known
    7.3.2. Calculations Taking Account of the Imprecision of the Variance Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    7.4. As Good as or Better Trials
    7.4.1. Worked Example 7.3
    7.5. Summary
    8. Sample Size Calculations for Equivalence Clinical Trials with Normal Data.
    8.1. Introduction
    8.2. Parallel Group Trials
    8.2.1. Sample Sizes Estimated Assuming the Population Variance to Be Known
    8.2.1.1. General Case
    8.2.1.2. Special Case of No Treatment Difference
    8.2.1.3. Worked Example 8.1
    8.2.1.4. Worked Example 8.2
    8.2.2. Sensitivity Analysis for the Assumed Mean Difference Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    8.2.2.1. Worked Example 8.3
    8.2.3. Calculations Taking Account of the Imprecision of the Variances Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    8.2.3.1. General Case
    8.2.3.2. Special Case of No Treatment Difference
    8.3. Cross-Over Trials
    8.3.1. Sample Size Estimated Assuming the Population Variance to Be Known
    8.3.1.1. General Case
    8.3.1.2. Special Case of No Treatment Difference
    8.3.2. Calculations Taking Account of the Imprecision of the Variance Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    8.3.2.1. General Case
    8.3.2.2. Special Case of No Treatment Difference
    8.4. Summary
    9. Sample Size Calculations for Bioequivalence Trials
    9.1. Introduction
    9.2. Cross-Over Trials
    9.2.1. Sample Sizes Estimated Assuming the Population Variance to Be Known
    9.2.1.1. General Case
    9.2.1.2. Special Case of the Mean Ratio Equalling Unity
    9.2.2. Replicate Designs
    9.2.3. Worked Example 9.1
    9.2.4. Sensitivity Analysis about the Variance Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    9.2.5. Worked Example 9.2
    9.2.6. Calculations Taking Account of the Imprecision of the Variance Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    9.2.6.1. General Case
    9.2.6.2. Special Case of the Mean Ratio Equalling Unity
    9.3. Parallel-Group Studies
    9.3.1. Sample Size Estimated Assuming the Population Variance to Be Known
    9.3.1.1. General Case
    9.3.1.2. Special Case of the Ratio Equalling Unity
    9.3.2. Calculations Taking Account of the Imprecision of the Variance Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    9.3.2.1. General Case
    9.3.2.2. Special Case of the Mean Ratio Equalling Unity
    9.4. Summary
    10. Sample Size Calculations for Precision Clinical Trials with Normal Data
    10.1. Introduction
    10.2. Parallel Group Trials
    10.2.1. Sample Size Estimated Assuming the Population Variance to Be Known
    10.2.1.1. Worked Example 10.1 – Standard Results
    10.2.1.2. Worked Example 10.2 – Using Results from Superiority Trials
    10.2.1.3. Worked Example 10.3 – Sample Size Is Based on Feasibility
    10.2.2. Sensitivity Analysis about the Variance Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    10.2.3. Worked Example 10.4
    10.2.4. Accounting for the Imprecision of the Variance in the Future Trial
    10.2.4.1. Worked Example 10.5 – Accounting for the Imprecision in the Variance in the Future Trial
    10.2.5. Calculations Taking Account of the Imprecision of the Variance Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    10.2.5.1. Worked Example 10.6 – Accounting for the Imprecision in the Variance Used in Calculations
    10.2.6. Allowing for the Imprecision in the Variance Used in the Sample Size Calculations and in Future Trials
    10.2.6.1. Worked Example 10.7 – Allowing for the Imprecision in the Variance Used in the Sample Size Calculations and in Future Trials
    10.3. Cross-Over Trials
    10.3.1. Sample Size Estimated Assuming the Population Variance to Be Known
    10.3.2. Sensitivity Analysis about the Variance Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    10.3.3. Accounting for the Imprecision of the Variance in the Future Trial
    10.3.4. Calculations Taking Account of the Imprecision of the Variance Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    10.3.5. Allowing for the Imprecision in the Variance Used in the Sample Size Calculations and in Future Trials
    10.4. Summary
    11. Sample Sizes for Pilot Studies
    11.1. Introduction
    11.2. Minimum Sample Size for a Pilot Study
    11.2.1. Reason 1: Feasibility
    11.2.2. Reason 2: Precision about the Mean and Variance
    11.2.2.1. Precision about the Mean
    11.2.2.2. Precision about the Variance
    11.2.3. Reason 3: Regulatory Considerations
    11.2.4. Discussion of Minimum Sample Size
    11.3. Recruiting on t and Not on n
    11.4 Optimising the Sample Size for a Pilot Trial
    11.5. Rules of Thumb Revisited
    11.6. Summary
    12. Sample Size Calculations for Parallel Group Superiority Clinical Trials with Binary Data
    12.1. Introduction
    12.2 Inference and Analysis of Clinical Trials with Binary Data
    12.3. Ο€s or ps
    12.3.1. Absolute Risk Difference
    12.3.1.1. Calculation of Confidence Intervals
    12.3.1.2. Normal Approximation
    12.3.1.3. Normal Approximation with Continuity Correction
    12.3.1.4. Exact Confidence Intervals
    12.3.2. Odds Ratio
    12.3.2.1. Calculation of Confidence Intervals
    12.4. Sample Sizes with the Population Effects Assumed Known
    12.4.1. Odds Ratio
    12.4.2. Absolute Risk Difference
    12.4.2.1. Method 1 – Using the Anticipated Responses
    12.4.2.2. Method 2 – Using the Responses under the Null and Alternative Hypotheses
    12.4.2.3. Accounting for Continuity Correction and Exact Methods
    12.4.2.4. Fisher’s Exact Test
    12.4.3. Worked Example 12.1 – Sample Size Calculation for a Parallel Group Superiority Trial with Binary Response
    12.4.4. Discussion of the Sample Size Calculations
    12.4.5. Equating Odds Ratios with Absolute Risks
    12.4.6. Equating Odds Ratios with Absolute Risks – Revisited
    12.4.7. Worked Example 12.2
    12.4.8. Worked Example 12.3
    12.4.9. Worked Example 12.4
    12.5. Inclusion of Baselines or Covariates
    12.5.1. Methods for Allowing for Covariates
    12.5.2. Comparison of Adjusted and Unadjusted Estimates
    12.5.3. Reflections on Allowing for Covariates
    12.5.4. Further Considerations – The Impact on Non-Inferiority and Equivalence Studies
    12.6. Sensitivity Analysis about the Estimates of the Population
    12.6.1. Worked Example 12.5
    12.6.2. Worked Example 12.6
    12.7. Calculations Taking Account of the Imprecision of the Estimates of the Population Effects Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    12.7.1. Odds Ratio
    12.7.2. Absolute Risk Difference
    12.7.3. Worked Example 12.7
    12.8. Summary
    13. Sample Size Calculations for Superiority Cross-Over Clinical Trials with Binary Data
    13.1. Introduction
    13.2. Analysis of a Trial
    13.2.1. Sample Size Estimation with the Population Effects Assumed Known
    13.2.1.1. Worked Example 13.1
    13.2.1.2. Worked Example 13.2
    13.2.2. Comparison of Cross-Over and Parallel-Group Results
    13.2.2.1. Worked Example 13.3
    13.2.2.2. Worked Example 13.4
    13.3. Analysis of a Trial Revisited
    13.4. Sensitivity Analysis about the Estimates of the Population Effects Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    13.5 Calculations Taking Account of the Imprecision of the Estimates of the Population Effects Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    13.6. Summary
    14. Sample Size Calculations for Non-Inferiority Trials with Binary Data
    14.1. Introduction
    14.2. Choice of Non-Inferiority Limit
    14.3. Parallel Group Trials Sample Size with the Population Effects Assumed Known
    14.3.1. Absolute Risk Difference
    14.3.1.1. Method 1 – Using Anticipated Responses
    14.3.2. Worked Example 1 – Sample Size Calculation for a Parallel Group Non-Inferiority Trial with Binary Response
    14.3.2.1. Method 2 – Using Anticipated Responses in Conjunction with the Non-Inferiority Limit
    14.3.2.2. Method 3 – Using Maximum Likelihood Estimates
    14.3.2.3. Comparison of the Three Methods of Sample Size Estimation
    14.3.3. Odds Ratio
    14.3.3.1. Worked Example 14.1
    14.3.4. Superiority Trials Re-Visited
    14.3.5. Sensitivity Analysis about the Estimates of the Population Effects Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    14.3.5.1. Worked Example 14.2
    14.3.6. Absolute Risk Difference Versus Odds Ratios – Revisited
    14.3.7. Calculations Taking Account of the Imprecision of the Estimates of the Population Effects Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    14.3.7.1. Worked Example 14.3
    14.3.8. Calculations Taking Account of the Imprecision of the Estimates of the Population Effects with Respect to the Assumptions about the Mean Difference and the Variance Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    14.3.8.1. Worked Example 14.5
    14.3.9. Cross-Over Trials
    14.4. As Good as or Better Trials
    14.4.1. A Test of Non-Inferiority and a One-Sided Test of Superiority
    14.4.2. A Test of Non-Inferiority and a Two-Sided Test of Superiority
    14.4.3. Sample Size Estimation
    14.5. Summary
    15. Sample Size Calculations for Equivalence Trials with Binary Data
    15.1. Introduction
    15.2. Parallel Group Trials
    15.2.1. Sample Sizes with the Population Effects Assumed Known – General Case
    15.2.1.1. Absolute Risk Difference
    15.2.1.2. Method 1 – Using Anticipated Responses
    15.2.2. Worked Example 1 – Sample Size Calculation for a Parallel Group Equivalence Trial with Binary Response
    15.2.2.1. Method 2 – Using Anticipated Responses in Conjunction with the Equivalence Limit
    15.2.2.2. Method 3 – Using Maximum Likelihood Estimates
    15.2.2.3. Comparison of the Three Methods
    15.2.2.4. Odds Ratio
    15.2.2.5. Worked Example 15.1
    15.2.3. Sensitivity Analysis about the Estimates of the Population Effects Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    15.2.3.1. Worked Example 15.2
    15.2.4. Calculations Taking Account of the Imprecision of the Estimates of the Populations Effects Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    15.2.4.1. Worked Example 15.3
    15.2.5. Calculations Taking Account of the Imprecision of the Population Effects with Respect to the Assumptions about the Mean Difference and the Variance Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    15.2.5.1. Worked Example 15.4
    15.3. Cross-Over Trials
    15.4. Summary
    16. Sample Size Calculations for Precision Trials with Binary Data
    16.1. Introduction
    16.2. Parallel Group Trials
    16.2.1. Absolute Risk Difference
    16.2.2. Worked Example 1 – Sample Size Calculation for a Parallel Group Estimation Trial with Binary Response
    16.2.3 Odds Ratio
    16.2.4. Equating Odds Ratios with Proportions
    16.2.5. Worked Example 16.1
    16.2.6. Sensitivity Analysis about the Estimates of the Population Effects Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    16.2.6.1. Worked Example 16.2
    16.3. Cross-Over Trials
    16.4. Summary
    17. Sample Size Calculations for Single-Arm Clinical Trials
    17.1. Introduction
    17.2. Single Proportion
    17.2.1. Confidence Interval Calculation
    17.2.1.1. Normal Approximation
    17.2.1.2. Exact Confidence Intervals
    17.2.2. One-Tailed or Two-Tailed?
    17.2.3 Sample Size Calculation
    17.2.3.1. Worked Example 1 – Sample Size Calculation for a Single Binary Response
    17.2.4. Sample Size Calculation Re-Visited – Sample Size Based on Feasibility
    17.2.4.1. Precision-Based Approach
    17.2.4.2. Probability of Seeing an Event
    17.2.4.3. Worked Example 2 – Calculating a Probability of Observing an Adverse Event
    17.3. Finite Population Size
    17.3.1. Practical Example
    17.3.1.1. Worked Example Ignoring the Finite Population Sample
    17.3.2. Methods for Accounting for Finite Populations
    17.3.2.1. Normal Approximation
    17.3.2.2. Beta Distribution
    17.3.2.3. Worked Example Accounting for the Finite Population Sample
    17.3.2.4. Extending the Results for a Normal Outcome
    17.4. Sample Size Calculations
    17.4.1. Standard Methods Ignoring the Finite Population Size
    17.4.1.1. Worked Example Ignoring the Finite Population Sample
    17.4.2. Methods for Accounting for Finite Populations
    17.4.2.1. Worked Example Accounting for the Finite Population Sample
    17.5. Summary
    18. Sample Sizes for Clinical Trials with an Adaptive Design
    18.1. Introduction
    18.2. Adaptive Designs
    18.2.1. Case Study
    18.3. Sample Size Re-Estimation for Normal Data
    18.3.1. Sample Sizes for Internal Pilot Trials – Assuming the Variance Is Known
    18.3.2. Sample Size Re-Estimation with a Restriction on the Sample Size
    18.3.2.1. Worked Example
    18.3.2.2. Worked Example
    18.3.3. Allowing for the Variance to Be Unknown
    18.4. Sample Size Re-Estimation for Binary Data
    18.5. Interim Analyses
    18.6. Allowing for an Assessment of Futility
    18.7. Sample Size Re-Estimation and Promising Zone
    18.7.1. Worked Example
    18.7.1.1. Discussion of Promising Zone
    18.8. Efficacy Interim Analyses
    18.8.1. Pocock Approach
    18.8.2. O’Brien-Fleming Approach
    18.8.3. Wang-Tsiatis Approach
    18.8.4. Special Case of One Interim Analysis
    18.8.5. Worked Example 18.1
    18.8.6. More than One Interim Analysis
    18.9. Summary
    19. Sample Size Calculations for Clinical Trials with Ordinal Data
    19.1. Introduction
    19.2. The Quality of Life Data
    19.3. Superiority Trials
    19.3.1. Parallel Group Trials
    19.3.2. Whitehead’s Method
    19.3.2.1. Worked Example 19.1 – Full Ordinal Scale
    19.3.2.2. Worked Example 19.2 – Effects of Dichotomisation
    19.3.2.3. Worked Example 19.3 – Additional Categories
    19.3.2.4. Worked Example 19.4 – Quick Result
    19.3.3. Noether’s Method
    19.3.3.1. Worked Example 19.5 – Illustrative Example
    19.3.3.2. Worked Example 19.6 – MRC Example Revisited – Full Ordinal Scale
    19.3.3.3. Worked Example 19.7 – Four Categories
    19.3.4. Comparison of Methods
    19.3.5. Sensitivity Analysis of the Estimates of the Population Effects Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    19.3.5.1. Worked Example 19.8 – Full Ordinal Scale
    19.3.6. Calculations Taking Account of the Imprecision of the Estimates of the Population Effects Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    19.3.6.1. Worked Example 19.9 – Full Ordinal Scale
    19.3.7. Cross-Over Trials
    19.3.7.1. Worked Example 19.10 – Full Ordinal Scale
    19.3.7.2. Worked Example 19.11 – Applying Parallel Group Methodology
    19.3.7.3. Worked Example 19.12 – Applying Binary Methodology
    19.3.8. Sensitivity Analysis of the Estimates of the Population Effects Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    19.3.8.1. Worked Example 19.13
    19.3.9. Calculations Taking Account of the Imprecision of the Estimates of the Population Effects Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    19.3.9.1. Worked Example 19.14
    19.4. Non-Inferiority Trials
    19.4.1. Parallel Group Trials
    19.4.1.1. Sensitivity Analysis of the Variance Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    19.4.1.2. Calculations Taking Account of the Imprecision of the Variance Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    19.4.2 Cross-Over Trials
    19.4.2.1. Sensitivity Analysis of the Variance Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    19.4.2.2. Calculations Taking Account of the Imprecision of the Variance Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    19.5. As Good As or Better Trials
    19.6. Equivalence Trials
    19.6.1. Parallel Group Trials
    19.6.1.1. Sensitivity Analysis of the Variance Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    19.6.1.2. Calculations Taking Account of the Imprecision of the Variances Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    19.6.2. Cross-Over Trials
    19.6.2.1. Sensitivity Analysis of the Variance Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    19.6.2.2. Calculations Taking Account of the Imprecision of the Variances Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    19.7. Estimation to a Given Precision
    19.7.1. Parallel Group Trials
    19.7.1.1. Worked Example 19.17
    19.7.1.2. Sensitivity Analysis of the Variance Used in the Sample Size Calculations
    19.7.1.3. Worked Example 19.18
    19.7.2. Cross-Over Trials
    19.8. Summary
    20. Estimating the Number of Events for Clinical Trials with Survival Data for a Negative Outcome
    20.1. Introduction
    20.2. Superiority Trials
    20.2.1. Method 1 – Assuming Exponential Survival
    20.2.2. Method 2 – Proportional Hazards Only
    20.2.2.1. Worked Example 20.1
    20.3. Delayed Treatment Effects
    20.4. Non-Inferiority Trials
    20.5. Equivalence Trials
    20.6. Precision Trials
    20.7. Summary
    21. Sample Size Calculations for Clinical Trials with Survival Data and a Positive Outcome
    21.1. Introduction
    21.2. Methods for Estimating the Number of Events
    21.2.1. Method of Whitehead
    21.2.2. Method of Noether
    21.2.2.1. Worked Example 21.1 – Estimating Number of Events Using Noether’s Approach
    21.2.3. Assuming the Data Are Log-Normal
    21.2.3.1. Worked Example 21.2 – Normal Approximation Approach
    21.2.4. Assuming the Data Are Normal (Revisited)
    21.2.4.1. Worked Example 21.3 – Normal Approach (Revisited)
    21.2.5. Summary of the Approaches So Far
    21.3. Assuming a Weibull Distribution
    21.3.1. Superiority Trials
    21.3.1.1. Worked Example 21.4 – Estimating Number of Events for a Weibull Model
    21.3.2. Non-Inferiority Trials
    21.3.3. Equivalence Trials
    21.3.4. Precision Trials
    21.4. Summary
    22. Sample Size Calculations for Clinical Trials with Survival Data Allowing for Recruitment and Loss and Follow-up
    22.1. Introduction
    22.2. Initial Estimation of Total Sample Size
    22.3. Loss to Follow-Up
    22.3.1. Worked Example 22.1 – Estimating Total Sample Size
    22.3.2. Summary of Simple Calculations
    22.4. Total Sample Size Re-Visited
    22.4.1. Worked Example 22.2 – Estimating Total Sample Size with a Uniform Pattern of Recruitment
    22.4.2. Worked Example 22.3 – Truncated Exponential Recruitment
    22.5. Summary of Worked Examples in the Chapter
    22.5.1. Worked Example 22.4 – Estimating Study Duration for a Fixed Total Sample
    22.6. Summary
    Appendix
    References
    Index


    πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


    Sample Sizes for Clinical Trials
    ✍ Steven A. Julious πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2009 🌐 English

    Drawing on various real-world applications, Sample Sizes for Clinical Trials takes readers through the process of calculating sample sizes for many types of clinical trials. It provides descriptions of the calculations with a practical emphasis. Focusing on normal, binary, ordinal, and survival d

    CRC Handbook of Sample Size Guidelines f
    ✍ Jonathan J. Shuster (Author) πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 1990 πŸ› CRC Press

    <p>The aim of this unique volume is to help medical researchers design clinical trials to improve survival, remission duration, or time to recurrence of disease. Written in a user-friendly step-by-step format, this work enables the researcher-with no background in statistics-to determine sample size

    Sample Size Determination in Clinical Tr
    ✍ Takashi Sozu, Tomoyuki Sugimoto, Toshimitsu Hamasaki, Scott R. Evans (auth.) πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2015 πŸ› Springer International Publishing 🌐 English

    <p><p>This book integrates recent methodological developments for calculating the sample size and power in trials with more than one endpoint considered as multiple primary or co-primary, offering an important reference work for statisticians working in this area.</p><p>The determination of sample s

    Sample Size Tables for Clinical Studies
    ✍ David Machin, Michael J. Campbell, Say-Beng Tan πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English

    This book provides statisticians and researchers with the statistical tools - equations, formulae and numerical tables - to design and plan clinical studies and carry out accurate, reliable and reproducible analysis of the data so obtained. There is no way around this as incorrect procedure in clini