Sample size requirements for the internal validation of psychiatric scales
β Scribed by Alexandra Rouquette; Bruno Falissard
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 307 KB
- Volume
- 20
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1049-8931
- DOI
- 10.1002/mpr.352
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
The ratio of subjects to variables (N/p), as a rule to calculate the sample size required in internal validity studies on measurement scales, has been recommended without any strict theoretical or empirical basis being provided. The purpose of the present study was to develop a tool to determine sample size for these studies in the field of psychiatry. First, a literature review was carried out to identify the distinctive features of psychiatric scales. Then, two simulation methods were developed to generate data according to: (1) the model for factor structure derived from the literature review and (2) a real dataset. This enabled the study of the quality of solutions obtained from principal component analysis or Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) on various sample sizes. Lastly, the influence of sample size on the precision of Cronbach's alpha coefficient was examined. The N/p ratio rule is not upheld by this study: short scales do not allow smaller sample size. As a rule of thumb, if one's aim is to reveal the factor structure, a minimum of 300 subjects is generally acceptable but should be increased when the number of factors within the scale is large, when EFA is used and when the number of items is small. Copyright Β© 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of bilateral variability in cross-sectional geometric properties of the adult canine proximal femur and to use these data to determine minimum detectable treatment effects in paired and independent experimental designs. Thirteen pairs of canine f
I provide sample size formulae and tables for the design of studies that compare two or more coefficients of inter-observer agreement or concordance. Such studies may arise, for example, when interest centres on assessment of how measures of inter-observer agreement vary across different patient sub
Three-hundred and two psychiatric inpatients (166 women and 136 men) completed Masling, Rabie, and Blondheim's Rorschach Oral Dependency (ROD) Scale and the Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale Revised (WAIS-R). As predicted, ROD scale scores were unrelated to WAIS-R scores in subjects of either sex. T