## Abstract Sample size calculations based on twoβsample comparisons of slopes in repeated measurements have been reported by many investigators. In contrast, the literature has paid relatively little attention to the design and analysis of __K__βsample trials in repeated measurements studies where
Sample size calculations for paired or matched ordinal data
β Scribed by S. A. Julious; M. J. Campbell
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 82 KB
- Volume
- 17
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0277-6715
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The problem of calculating the number of subjects in a paired or matched study in which the outcome variable is ordinal is discussed. A common approach in the case of a two category variable is to calculate the required number of discordant pairs, and then divide this by the expected proportion of discordant pairs to obtain the total sample size. An approximate solution for the number of discordant pairs is proposed for ordinal data and compared to sample sizes estimated through simulation. It is shown that the sample sizes are underestimated when the number of categories is two, but that the approximation improves as the number of categories increases. Comparison of the required discordant sample size when there are two categories with the required sample size for more than two categories would suggest that the loss of power is not great if a categorical variable is collapsed into only two categories. However, the total sample size required is likely to be greater with only two categories, since the expected proportion of discordant to concordant pairs increases. Since the expected number of discordant pairs is likely to decrease as the number of categories increases, this suggests that as a rule of thumb the required discordant sample size for the two category case be used as an approximation to the total required sample size when the number of categories is greater than two.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract The pairedβ__t__, sign, and signed rank tests were compared for samples from a bivariate exponential distribution. Each is a valid Ξ±βlevel test. One test was not uniformly more powerful than the others for all sample sizes, Ξ± levels, correlations, and alternative hypotheses considered,
## Abstract Health care utilization and outcome studies call for hierarchical approaches. The objectives were to predict major complications following percutaneous coronary interventions by health providers, and to compare Bayesian and nonβBayesian sample size calculation methods. The hierarchical
We discuss a sample size calculation for a pair-matched case-control study to test for interaction between a speci"c exposure and a second risk factor. The second risk factor could be either binary or continuous. An algorithm for the calculation of sample size is suggested which is based on a logist
One approach to establish linkage is based on allele-sharing methods for sib pairs. Recently, the use of extreme sib pairs (ESP) has been proposed to increase power for mapping quantitative traits in humans. Several approaches have been discussed. In this study, we calculate sample sizes for the var