✦ LIBER ✦

Rules for the classification of younger children with Nonverbal Learning Disabilities and Basic Phonological Processing Disabilities

✍ Scribed by Christine R. Drummond; Saadia A. Ahmad; Byron P. Rourke

Book ID: 116179973
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2005
Tongue: English
Weight: 212 KB
Volume: 20
Category: Article
ISSN: 0887-6177
DOI: 10.1016/j.acn.2004.05.001

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

The developmental course of processing s

The developmental course of processing speed in children with and without learning disabilities

✍ Michael David Weiler; Peter Forbes; Michael Kirkwood; Deborah Waber 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 180 KB

Factorial structure of the quick neurolo

Factorial structure of the quick neurological screening test-revised for children with learning disabilities

✍ Shannon B. Finlayson; John E. Obrzut 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 389 KB 👁 1 views

SOME IMPRESSIONS ON THE EFFECT OF SENSOR

SOME IMPRESSIONS ON THE EFFECT OF SENSORY INTEGRATIVE THERAPY FOR CHILDREN WITH LEARNING DISABILITIES

✍ Elaine B Wilson 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 605 KB

Summer holiday respite provision for the

Summer holiday respite provision for the families of children and young people with learning disabilities

✍ P McGill 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 519 KB

Clinical Use of the Benton Visual Retent

Clinical Use of the Benton Visual Retention Test for Children and Adolescents with Learning Disabilities

✍ Jeffrey H. Snow 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 73 KB

Discriminant validity of the Development

Discriminant validity of the Developmental Test of Visual Perception–2 for children with learning disabilities

✍ Sol Moryosef-Ittah; Prof. Jim Hinojosa 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 61 KB

## Abstract This study examined the discriminant validity of the Developmental Test of Visual Perception‐2 (DTVP‐2). It was administered to 17 children between the ages 7 and 10 with learning disabilities. Their scores were compared with the reported scores of the normative sample and found to be s