✦ LIBER ✦

RTNS-II tritium scrubber design and performance

✍ Scribed by B.J. Schumacher

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1980
Weight: 51 KB
Volume: 31
Category: Article
ISSN: 0020-708X
DOI: 10.1016/0020-708x(80)90283-5

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Design and performance testing of a trit

Design and performance testing of a tritium calorimeter

✍ M.I. Thornton; G. Vassallo; J. Miller; J.A. Mason 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 551 KB

Performance and design of hydrocyclones—

Performance and design of hydrocyclones—II : Pressure drop in the hydrocyclone

✍ K. Rietema 📂 Article 📅 1961 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 507 KB

Photoelectron-photoion coincidence spect

Photoelectron-photoion coincidence spectroscopy: II. Design and performance of a practical instrument

✍ C.J. Danby; J.H.D. Eland 📂 Article 📅 1972 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 592 KB

Design and implementation of a web-based

Design and implementation of a web-based Internet performance management system using SNMP MIB-II

✍ Seong Jin Ahn; Seung Keun Yoo; Jin Wook Chung 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 820 KB

## This article is aimed at defining items of analysis using SNMP MIB-II for the purpose of analyzing the performance of Internet-based networks running on TCP/IP protocol, and then utilizing these items, in conjunction with various Web technology and JAVA, to design and implement a Web-based inte

The design and performance of the 384-el

The design and performance of the 384-element imaging submillimeter detector arrays for HAWC and SHARC II

✍ Moseley, S.H; Allen, C.A; Benford, D; Dowell, C.D; Harper, D.A; Phillips, T.G; S 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 191 KB

Solenoidal microcoil design?Part II: Opt

Solenoidal microcoil design?Part II: Optimizing winding parameters for maximum signal-to-noise performance

✍ Minard, Kevin R. ;Wind, Robert A. 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 304 KB

## Abstract In high‐field proton NMR, the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) achieved with a close‐fitting solenoidal microcoil is adversely affected by radio frequency (RF) losses in the coil, its leads, the capacitor used to tune it, and finally, the sample. In Part II, a rigorous description of these v