𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Routine clinical brain MRI sequences for use at 3.0 Tesla

✍ Scribed by Hanzhang Lu; Lidia M. Nagae-Poetscher; Xavier Golay; Doris Lin; Martin Pomper; Peter C.M. van Zijl


Book ID
102907759
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2005
Tongue
English
Weight
715 KB
Volume
22
Category
Article
ISSN
1053-1807

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Purpose

To establish image parameters for some routine clinical brain MRI pulse sequences at 3.0 T with the goal of maintaining, as much as possible, the well‐characterized 1.5‐T image contrast characteristics for daily clinical diagnosis, while benefiting from the increased signal to noise at higher field.

Materials and Methods

A total of 10 healthy subjects were scanned on 1.5‐T and 3.0‐T systems for T~1~ and T~2~ relaxation time measurements of major gray and white matter structures. The relaxation times were subsequently used to determine 3.0‐T acquisition parameters for spin‐echo (SE), T~1~‐weighted, fast spin echo (FSE) or turbo spin echo (TSE), T~2~‐weighted, and fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) pulse sequences that give image characteristics comparable to 1.5 T, to facilitate routine clinical diagnostics. Application of the routine clinical sequences was performed in 10 subjects, five normal subjects and five patients with various pathologies.

Results

T~1~ and T~2~ relaxation times were, respectively, 14% to 30% longer and 12% to 19% shorter at 3.0 T when compared to the values at 1.5 T, depending on the region evaluated. When using appropriate parameters, routine clinical images acquired at 3.0 T showed similar image characteristics to those obtained at 1.5 T, but with higher signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), which can be used to reduce the number of averages and scan times. Recommended imaging parameters for these sequences are provided.

Conclusion

When parameters are adjusted for changes in relaxation rates, routine clinical scans at 3.0 T can provide similar image appearance as 1.5 T, but with superior image quality and/or increased speed. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2005;22:13–22. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Water excitation MPRAGE: An alternative
✍ Ersan Altun; Richard C. Semelka; Brian M. Dale; Jorge Elias Jr 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 172 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic image quality of postgadolinium water excitation–magnetization‐prepared rapid gradient‐echo (WE‐MPRAGE) sequence in abdominal examinations of noncooperative patients at 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3.0T MRI. ## Materials and Methods Eighty‐nine consecutive

Clinical functional MRI of sensorimotor
✍ Maria Blatow; Julia Reinhardt; Katharina Riffel; Ernst Nennig; Martina Wengenrot 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 487 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose: To establish a passive motor paradigm for clinical functional MRI (fMRI) that could be beneficial for patients with motor or attention deficits who are not able to perform active motor tasks. ## Materials and Methods: A novel standardized sensorimotor fMRI protocol was ap