๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Ross's antinomy and modal arguments for God's existence

โœ Scribed by John Zeis


Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Year
1986
Tongue
English
Weight
256 KB
Volume
20
Category
Article
ISSN
0020-7047

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


In his book Philosophical Theology, James Ross offers a modal argument for the existence of God which leads to an antinomy. 1 This antinomy and the problems derived from it exhibit the impossibility of successfully completing a modal argument for God's existence. Other philosophers have proposed versions of the modal argument for God's existence, but none have shown as keen an understanding of the argument or have developed it as thoroughly as Ross has. 2 Ross's version of the argument is the strongest version of the argument and so if his argument is not successful, none will be and that his is not successful and could never be successful will be established in this paper.

The argument in question is presented by Ross on pages 131-132 of Philosophical Theology and is essentially the following:


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


An argument for God's existence
โœ David E. White ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1979 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 780 KB

Doubts about the principle of sufficient reason and about the impossibility of an infinite causal regress have often been linked with doubts about the cosmological argument for God's existence. My intention is to show that a cosmological argument for God's existence (not that of a first cause simpli

Existence and uniqueness of periodic sol
โœ Bingwen Liu ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2008 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 243 KB

In this paper, we consider a kind of Rayleigh equation with two deviating arguments of the form By using the coincidence degree theory, we establish new results on the existence and uniqueness of periodic solutions for the above equation.