Doubts about the principle of sufficient reason and about the impossibility of an infinite causal regress have often been linked with doubts about the cosmological argument for God's existence. My intention is to show that a cosmological argument for God's existence (not that of a first cause simpli
Ross's antinomy and modal arguments for God's existence
โ Scribed by John Zeis
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Year
- 1986
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 256 KB
- Volume
- 20
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0020-7047
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
In his book Philosophical Theology, James Ross offers a modal argument for the existence of God which leads to an antinomy. 1 This antinomy and the problems derived from it exhibit the impossibility of successfully completing a modal argument for God's existence. Other philosophers have proposed versions of the modal argument for God's existence, but none have shown as keen an understanding of the argument or have developed it as thoroughly as Ross has. 2 Ross's version of the argument is the strongest version of the argument and so if his argument is not successful, none will be and that his is not successful and could never be successful will be established in this paper.
The argument in question is presented by Ross on pages 131-132 of Philosophical Theology and is essentially the following:
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
In this paper, we consider a kind of Rayleigh equation with two deviating arguments of the form By using the coincidence degree theory, we establish new results on the existence and uniqueness of periodic solutions for the above equation.
In this paper, we use the coincidence degree theory to establish new results on the existence and uniqueness of T -periodic solutions for a kind of Duffing equation with two deviating arguments of the form