𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Ross on the possibility of moral theory

✍ Scribed by Nancy Davis; Dale Jamieson


Publisher
Springer
Year
1987
Tongue
English
Weight
524 KB
Volume
21
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-5363

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


After Virtue ... reflects a very modern brand of philosophical nervousness (dare one say 'shrillness'?) about value judgments unless they are held true in virtue of some further thing beyond the conditions they arise out of. In fact ... no such further fictions are required for evaluative discourse to be in good order. The problem is not that we have too many concepts unconnected to clear teleologies, before persons any more than before art. The problem lies in handling this fact with tacL resourcefulness and skill. 1


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A Semantics for Possibility Theory Based
✍ Didier Dubois; Serafı́n Moral; Henri Prade πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 207 KB

In this paper, a semantic basis for Possibility Theory based on likelihood functions is presented. In some cases, possibilities have been considered as approximations of Shafer plausibility measures. This approximation exchanges exactness of plausibility values for the simplicity of use of possibili

W. D. Ross and the nature of moral oblig
✍ William R. Neblett πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1973 πŸ› Springer 🌐 English βš– 833 KB

I find many philosophical discussions on the topic of moral obligation to be misleading and mispointed. A good deal of mental, and no doubt physical, energy is expended in a manner that does not show positive returns. Moral philosophers, it seems to me, are inclined to straight-jacket our moral conc

cover
✍ Smith, Adam πŸ“‚ Fiction πŸ“… 2010;2014 πŸ› Penguin Publishing Group 🌐 English βš– 320 KB

The 250th-anniversary edition of the influential treatise on social responsibility that has shaped leaders from Bill Gates to Barack Obama Best known for his revolutionary free-market economics treatise The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith was first and foremost a moral philosopher. In his first book,