The purpose of this study was to examine psychotherapists' differential countertransference reactions toward either clients diagnosed with either Major Depression or Borderline Personality Disorder. Specifically, psychotherapists' personal perceptions and emotional reactions to these clients were as
Rorschach revised DEPI and CDI with inpatient major depressives and borderline personality disorder with major depression: Validity issues
โ Scribed by Carole F. Carlson; Michael L. Kula; Carole M. St. Laurent
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1997
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 95 KB
- Volume
- 53
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0021-9762
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
This study focused on the clinical field validity of the Rorschach comprehensive system revised DEPI and CDI indices. Forty admission protocols from two inpatient adult DSM-III-R diagnosed samples, one with Major Depressive Disorder, uncomplicated, and one with Major Depressive Disorder and concurrent Borderline Personality Disorder, were compared. Hypotheses were (a) both groups would be identified by the revised DEPI and (b) if the Depressed Borderline group was not identified by the DEPI, it would be identified by the CDI. Both hypotheses were negated, raising questions regarding the validity of the indices for use in clinical diagnosis, treatment, and clinical research.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
It has been well established that early adversity is a major risk factor for depression and for anxiety disorders in various populations and age groups. Few studies have considered the relative strength of these associations and the possible role of co-morbid depression/anxiety in understanding them