𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Rooting the tree of knowledge: A response to Henriques' “Psychology Defined”

✍ Scribed by Jack Presbury

Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
50 KB
Volume
60
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-9762

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

Abstract

Neither science nor culture could exist without a participant–observer and a conceiving human mind. Being‐in‐the‐world, or “Dasein,” as Heidegger termed it, is fundamental to any conceptual understanding we have of how things work in the universe. There is no view from nowhere. Psychology is the primordial ground in which the tree of knowledge has its roots. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Some discontents with theoretical unific
Some discontents with theoretical unification: A response to Henriques' “Psychology Defined”
✍ Stephen C. Yanchar 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 47 KB

## Abstract In response to Henriques' article “Psychology Defined” (this issue), I argue that theoretical unification should not be pursued for its own sake and that many psychologists are unlikely to endorse the specific unifying principles of the Tree of Knowledge System. It is suggested that oth

The field of clinical psychology: A resp
The field of clinical psychology: A response to Thorne
✍ Donald K. Routh 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 69 KB 👁 2 views

This article begins with a retrospective review of the editorial written in 1945 by Frederick C. Thorne at the inauguration of his new publication, the Journal of Clinical Psychology. It first considers the predictions made by Thorne about the future of clinical psychology and which of these turned

The end of clinical psychology as we kno
The end of clinical psychology as we know it? A response to Snyder and Elliott's four level matrix model
✍ Stephan Desrochers; Diane F. Halpern; Sherylle J. Tan; Heidi R. Riggio 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 54 KB

## Abstract C.R. Snyder and T.R. Elliott's proposed model (this issue) represents a good effort toward reexamining the premises of clinical psychology education. However, there are several concepts left underdeveloped and inadequately defined. Furthermore, their ideas for improving clinical trainin