Ftg 1 Configuratum of an envelope coatamng bubbles m the detachment and cut-off stages angle hes between 190 and 22" It IS also mtcrestmg to note that both measured and denved values of the cone angle are mdependent of the ordice stz.e and the gas mjectton rate Lkpartment of Mechanrcal Eftgoteertng
Role of dimensionless numbers in wave analysis
✍ Scribed by Surendra Kumar Mishra; Vijay P. Singh
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2003
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 214 KB
- Volume
- 17
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-6087
- DOI
- 10.1002/hyp.1159
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Dimensionless numbers, including the Reynolds number R~e~, the wave number $\hat{\sigma}$, the Froude number F~o~, the quasi‐shallow wave number $\hat{\sigma}_{\rm v}$, the kinematic wave number K, Vedernikov number V, and others, are frequently encountered in analytical and numerical analyses of waves occurring in frictional and frictionless channels. Depending on their derivation, these numbers can be classified into physical, geometrical, derived, input‐based numbers, and their combinations. It can be shown that (a) the waves under friction are primarily governed by R~e~, pointing to friction laws and, consequently, the rating exponent; (b) the wave number characterizes the wave type for a given R~e~; (c) the numbers describing the reference state of flow do not have the efficacy of characterizing a wave type on its own, e.g. F~o~ that describes the significance of inertial forces in wave motion; (d) coupling of F~o~ with $\hat{\sigma}$ produces a more efficacious number K; (e) Vedernikov number V, a combination of the rating exponent or, in turn, R~e~ and F~o~, is more powerful than either R~e~ or F~o~; and (f) the numbers emanating from analytical solutions describe the wave types, whereas those emanating from numerical analyses usually prescribe the limits for stable solutions, such as Courant number C~r~ and cell Reynolds number D. The significance of these numbers is described using the case of evolution and propagation of a dam‐break flood wave. Furthermore, it is shown that as $\hat{\sigma}$ forms the basic unit of shallow wave description, then quasi‐shallow waves are described by the quasi‐shallow wave number $\hat{\sigma}_{\rm v}$, the wave length parameter normalized by the normal depth of flow. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
This paper studies deviations of open-loop properties in the presence of modeling uncertainties. Our aim is to gain insights into how open-loop properties and thus potentially closed-loop properties may vary in the face of a diagonally structured uncertainty. We give several estimates for the worst