Rod and cone contribution to adaptation processes in cat retinal ganglion cells
✍ Scribed by E. Günther; E. Zrenner
- Publisher
- Springer-Verlag
- Year
- 1990
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 579 KB
- Volume
- 75
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0012-4486
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Extracellular ganglion cell responses were recorded to investigate mechanisms of light adaptation. Monochromatic test spots (575 nm) were projected onto the receptive field center of off-center cells and superimposed on a steady blue-green Ganzfeld background (Schott Filter BG 28), the strength of which was increased in steps of 0.5 log units to adapt rods. Response vs. log intensity functions were determined over a range of 7 log units of test light irradiance at each background level. At higher adaptation levels response thresholds followed the typical Weber function. Surprisingly at lower adaptation levels the sensitivity of the cell increased by about 0.7 log units, most markedly in a range of 1 log unit of moderate light adaptation when the background was changed from dark to the dimmest detectable background (10 51m/m2). In the dark-adapted state a small off-response of long latency (40-100ms at 102 quanta 9 s -1 9 #m 2) is observed at low rod stimulating test light irradiances. A transition to a cone-dominated transient response of 2 to 5 ms duration occurred at high intensities (105 quanta-s-1 o /~m 2). At mesopic levels the two responses seem to cancel each other, rendering a delayed off-response that is probably the result of rod-cone interaction. As in psychophysics, saturation can be observed at very high background intensities (10 6 quanta. s -1/lm 2). These data suggest interactions between rods and cones that determine the sensitivity of cat retinal ganglion cells at low levels of adaptation for suprathreshold stimuli.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
A well-known feature of the mammalian retina is the inverse relation that exists in central and peripheral retina between the density of retinal ganglion cells and their dendritic field sizes. Functionally, this inverse relation is thought to represent a means by which retinal coverage is maintained