✦ LIBER ✦

Robust analysis of variance based upon a likelihood ratio criterion

✍ Scribed by SCHRADER, RONALD M.; HETTMANSPERGER, THOMAS P.

Book ID: 118165350
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Year: 1980
Tongue: English
Weight: 597 KB
Volume: 67
Category: Article
ISSN: 0006-3444
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/67.1.93

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Robust confidence intervals for contrast

Robust confidence intervals for contrasts based upon a likelihood ratio test

✍ M. Bachmaier; M. Precht 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 626 KB

The comparative analysis of statistics,

The comparative analysis of statistics, based on the likelihood ratio criterion, in the automated annotation problem

✍ Andrey M Leontovich; Konstantin Y Tokmachev; Hans C van Houwelingen 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 BioMed Central 🌐 English ⚖ 872 KB

Testing the Robustness of the Likelihood

Testing the Robustness of the Likelihood-Ratio Test in a Variance-Component Quantitative-Trait Loci–Mapping Procedure

✍ David B. Allison; Michael C. Neale; Raffaella Zannolli; Nicholas J. Schork; Chri 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 American Society of Human Genetics 🌐 English ⚖ 544 KB

A normal approximation to distributions

A normal approximation to distributions of likelihood ratio statistics in life testing, reliability and multivariate analysis of variance

✍ N. Singh 📂 Article 📅 1984 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 317 KB

A comparison of the ratio of variances i

A comparison of the ratio of variances in distance-based and classical multivariate analysis

✍ Patrick J. F. Groenen; Jacqueline J. Meulman 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 151 KB

Comparison of analysis of variance and m

Comparison of analysis of variance and maximum likelihood based path analysis of twin data: Partitioning genetic and environmental sources of covariance

✍ Joe C. Christian; James A. Norton Jr.; Jeffrey Sorbel; Christopher J. Williams 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 594 KB

In order to investigate currently used model fitting strategies for twin data, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and path-maximum-likelihood (PATH-ML) methods of analyzing twin data were compared using simulation studies of 50 monozygotic (MZ) and 50 dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs. Phenotypic covariance was p