## Abstract ## Objectives To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of a novel rivastigmine transdermal patch with conventional rivastigmine capsules and placebo in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). ## Methods In this 24‐week, multicenter, double‐blind, double‐dummy, placebo‐ and ac
Rivastigmine transdermal patch and capsule in Alzheimer's disease: influence of disease stage on response to therapy
✍ Scribed by Martin R. Farlow; George T. Grossberg; Xiangyi Meng; Jason Olin; Monique Somogyi
- Book ID
- 102227249
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 373 KB
- Volume
- 26
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-6230
- DOI
- 10.1002/gps.2669
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Objectives
The cholinesterase inhibitor rivastigmine is approved for the symptomatic treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). This exploratory, hypothesis‐forming analysis assessed response to rivastigmine according to severity of dementia at baseline.
Methods
This was a retrospective analysis of a large randomized, placebo‐controlled trial (ENA713D2320). AD patients treated with 9.5 mg/24 h rivastigmine patch, 17.4 mg/24 h rivastigmine patch, rivastigmine capsule (12 mg/day), or placebo were stratified according to baseline Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores: ≥7 to ≤12 (severe disease), ≥13 to ≤15 (moderately severe), ≥16 to ≤18 (moderate), or ≥19 to ≤25 (mild to moderate). Changes from baseline at Week 24 on Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale–cognitive subscale (ADAS‐cog), Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study–Clinical Global Impression of Change (ADCS‐CGIC), and Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study–Activities of Daily Living (ADCS‐ADL) were assessed.
Results
Based on baseline MMSE scores, 141, 228, 333, and 348 patients had severe, moderately severe, moderate, and mild to moderate dementia. Worsening of ADAS‐cog, ADCS‐CGIC, and ADCS‐ADL scores in patients receiving placebo were greater in patients with more severe dementia. Significant improvements versus placebo were seen with rivastigmine patch and/or capsule on ADAS‐cog, ADCS‐CGIC, and ADCS‐ADL scores in patients with severe, moderately severe, and moderate AD (all p < 0.05). However, no significant improvements were seen in rivastigmine‐treated patients with mild to moderate AD.
Conclusions
Rivastigmine benefits AD patients across dementia stages. Similar to previous cholinesterase inhibitor studies, greatest treatment effects with rivastigmine patch and capsule were seen in patients with more advanced dementia, most likely driven by greater placebo decline in this population. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Assess long-term cost-effectiveness of rivastigmine patch in Alzheimer's disease (AD) management in the UK, using cognitive and functional models based on clinical trial efficacy data. Methods: Incremental costs and Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) associated with rivastigmine patch and capsule t
Background. Anticholinesterase therapies oer modest bene®t to subgroups of AD suerers. However, there has previously been no way of predicting which patients will respond to any of the drugs. Objective. To discover if gender and/or apolipoprotein E genotype can be used as predictors of response in