๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Risk models for familial ovarian and breast cancer

โœ Scribed by Antonis C. Antoniou; Simon A. Gayther; John F. Stratton; Bruce A.J. Ponder; Douglas F. Easton


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
106 KB
Volume
18
Category
Article
ISSN
0741-0395

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


We investigated risk models for the inherited susceptibility of breast and ovarian cancer, using data from both high-risk families and a population based series of ovarian cancer. The first data set consisted of 112 families containing two or more relatives with epithelial ovarian cancer. BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations were detected in 50% of these families. The second study involved 374 ovarian cancer cases, unselected for family history, who had DNA samples analyzed for BRCA1 mutations. Twelve women were found to be carriers. We constructed genetic models for ovarian and breast cancer using the computer program MENDEL. In the first study, we modeled the effects of BRCA1 and BRCA2 simultaneously and allowed for a third gene predisposing to ovarian cancer. None of the models fitted gave significant evidence for a third gene. Population frequencies of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were estimated to be 0.00128 and 0.00172, respectively. Our results suggest that BRCA1 and BRCA2 may be sufficient to explain the majority of familial ovarian cancer and that families without mutations can be explained by sensitivity of mutation testing and chance clusters of sporadic cases. Using data on the families of the 12 mutation carriers in the second study, we estimated age-specific ovarian and breast cancer risks for BRCA1 mutation carriers. Under the best-fitting model, the cumulative ovarian cancer risk was 66% by age 70, and the corresponding breast cancer risk was 45%. The high penetrance estimate for ovarian cancer, compared with other studies, suggests that modifying genetic or environmental factors may be important determinants of risk.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Risk of familial breast cancer
โœ David E. Anderson; Michael D. Badzioch ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1985 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 453 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views
Family history of cancer and risk of bre
โœ Eva Negri; Claudia Braga; Carlo La Vecchia; Silvia Franceschi; Fabio Parazzini ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ French โš– 43 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

The relationship between breast cancer risk and family history of cancer in first-degree relatives was investigated using data from a multicentric case-control study conducted in Italy between June 1991 and April 1994 on 2,569 women aged less than 75 years, with histologically confirmed incident bre

Psychosocial aspects of cancer genetics:
โœ Kathryn M. Kash; Karina Ortega-Verdejo; Mary Kay Dabney; Jimmie C. Holland; Dani ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 39 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

In the past five years the advent of cancer genetic testing has created concern about the negative psychosocial sequelae of genetic counseling and testing. Research indicates that the women most likely to seek genetic testing are anxious about carrying a gene mutation and developing breast cancer. W

Familial risk and colon cancer
โœ Randall W. Burt ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ French โš– 376 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views