Risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
β Scribed by Fabio Parazzini; Carlo La Vecchia; Eva Negri; Luigi Fedele; Silvia Franceschi; Liliana Gallotta
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1992
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 620 KB
- Volume
- 69
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
To evaluate risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), data were collected in a case-control study based on 366 patients (58 with CIN class 1, 70 with CIN class 2, and 238 with CIN class 3) and 323 control subjects with normal cervical smears interviewed on selected days at the same screening clinics where cases had been identified. No relationship emerged between indicators of socioeconomic status (education and social class) and risk of mild/moderate (considered together) and severe dysplasia. A total of 55 (43%) patients with CIN class 1 or 2, 107 (45%) patients with CIN class 3, and 94 (29%) controls were current smokers. The corresponding relative risk (RR) estimates for current versus never smokers were 1.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2 to 3.0) for patients with CIN class 1 or 2 and 2.5 (95% CI 1.7 to 3.6) for patients with CIN class 3, and the risk increased with the number of cigarettes smoked per day. No relationship was observed between oral contraceptive use, parity, spontaneous or induced abortions and the risk of CIN, but patients tended to report earlier age at first birth than control subjects. Compared with women reporting their first birth before the age of 20 years, the risk estimates were 0.5 and 0.4, respectively, for patients with CIN 1 or 2 and patients with CIN 3 in women reporting first birth at 20 to 24 years of age. The risk estimates were 0.5 and 0.6 for those reporting their first birth at age 25 or later, but the trends in risk were not statistically significant. The number of sexual partners was directly associated with From the
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
During 1977During -1983, 787 , 787 consecutive referred cases of CJN were treated by vaporization of a dome-shaped defect, by excision of a cylindrical specimen, or a combination of procedures where 48 % were CIN 111. Vaporization was used for 72% of CIN I, 76% of CIN 11, and 64% of CIN 111 cases.
## Abstract Invasive cancer of the cervix after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is becoming more important, as screening reduces the incidence of invasive disease. The rate of invasive cervical or vaginal cancer following treatment for CIN in UK remains elevated for at least