๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Risk Communication || Develop a Communication Plan

โœ Scribed by Lundgren, Regina E.; McMakin, Andrea H.


Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Year
2009
Weight
130 KB
Category
Article
ISBN
0470416890

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Now that you have determined your purpose and objectives, analyzed your audience, chosen your methods, and set your schedule, you need to put them all together into a comprehensive plan. Why not just keep the information in your head, notes on your desk, or a file in your computer? There are several reasons: ศ› A written plan is less likely to be lost than miscellaneous notes or files. ศ› At some point in the risk communication process, someone either inside or outside the organization may challenge your methods or approach. Having a comprehensive plan is a good defense. ศ› Having a formal plan that has been accepted (through signatures if necessary) by management can be handy in setting priorities and getting timely approvals for specific activities. ศ› Because formal plans are more organized, easier to review, and imply a more formal effort, the efforts they describe are more likely to receive the necessary funding and resources than those in nebulous plans. ศ› It is easier to evaluate the results of formal plans, because you can relate results directly back to your purpose and objectives, schedule, and audience.

The elements to include in a communication plan and how to bring all the elements together are discussed in the remainder of this chapter.

WHAT TO INCLUDE IN A COMMUNICATION PLAN

A variety of information contributes to a comprehensive communication plan, as shown in the outline in Figure 12-1. You may also want to include other elements, depending on Risk Communication, Fourth Edition.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Risk Communication || Emergency Risk Com
โœ Lundgren, Regina E.; McMakin, Andrea H. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley & Sons, Inc. โš– 176 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

Since the initial publication of this book, certain situations have challenged risk communicators, even beyond the normal challenges of communicating environmental, safety, and health risks to audiences who may be apathetic (in care communication), frustrated (in consensus communication), or fearful