๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Risk assessment and risk management implications of hormesis

โœ Scribed by Carl J. Paperiello


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
21 KB
Volume
20
Category
Article
ISSN
0260-437X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


International and US radiation protection standards are based upon risk assessment and risk management processes. The assessment of radiation risk is derived from the linear no-threshold (LNT) model. Risk management is based on more subjective value judgements. If the radiation dose-response was found to be hormetic, considerable quantitative data would be needed before current radiation protection standards would change. There would be added complexity, and consideration might have to be given to the additive effects of an individual's exposures to medical radiation and other potential carcinogens.

As a regulatory agency the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) mission is to protect public health and safety and the common defense and security of the USA. One of the NRC's tasks is to ensure the safety and health of workers and the public from exposure to ionizing radiation from the use of those nuclear materials regulated under the Atomic Energy Act. The task of ensuring safety requires the NRC to take two actions. The first is to determine the risk from exposure to ionizing radiation, and the second is to establish the acceptability of the risk. These are usually referred to as risk assessment and risk management and they should not be confused. Risk assessment tends to be the more objective and scientific, whereas risk management is value-laden and strongly affected by societal and ethical views.

In the USA, the regulation of ionizing radiation protection standards is spread among a number of state and federal agencies. The scientific bases for radiation protection standards are included in the recommendations of several committees, including: the International Commission of Radiological Protection (ICRP), the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR), the United States National Research Council's Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR) and the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP). The assessment of risks from ionizing radiation by all of these committees is based on the linear no-threshold (LNT) model. In this model the stochastic consequences of radiation are considered to be a linear function of dose and, except for one small correction, almost completely independent of dose rate.

The LNT model-the current scientific paradigm for the effect of low-level ionizing radiation-is used by the NRC for assessing radiation risks and performing cost-benefit analyses to assist in determining the consequences of regulatory actions. It is instructive to trace


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Ecological risk assessment: implications
โœ William H. Van Der Schalie; John H. Gentile ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 88 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

Hormesis is a widespread phenomenon across many taxa and chemicals, and, at the single species level, issues regarding the application of hormesis to human health and ecological risk assessment are similar. For example, convincing the public of a 'beneficial' effect of environmental chemicals may be

Environmental law applications of hormes
โœ Robin L. Juni; Junius C. McElveen; Jr. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 67 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

This article focuses on legal structures that influence the degree to which hormesis can be incorporated into environmental law and policy. Three statutes-the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Food Quality Protection Act, and the Clean Air Act-are used to illustrate the varied ways in which Co

The role of risk assessment and risk man
โœ Roy E. Kwiatkowski ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 124 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

There is an increasing awareness among environmental professionals and public that a totally risk free environment is an unattainable goal, and that the development of eective risk management strategies, involving a wide variety of scientiยฎc and societal considerations, is needed. The Department of

Risk management
โœ Judith Myerson ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 262 KB
Assessing and managing violence risk in
โœ Randy K. Otto ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 117 KB

Psychologists and other mental health professionals practicing in essentially all clinical settings are called on to assess and manage clients who may pose a risk of violence to third parties. Over the past 25 years much has been learned about the relationship between violence and mental disorder, a