Risk Assessment and Decision Making Using Test Results: The Carcinogenicity Prediction and Battery Selection Approach
β Scribed by Julia Pet-Edwards, Yacov Y. Haimes, Vira Chankong, Herbert S. Rosenkranz, Fanny K. Ennever (auth.)
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Year
- 1989
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 213
- Edition
- 1
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The difficulties associated with making risk assessments on the basis of experimental results are familiar to practitioners in many fieldsΒ engineering, epidemiology, chemistry, etc. These difficulties are particularly common in problems that have dynamic and stochastic characteristics driven by multiple purposes and goals, with complex interconnections and interΒ dependencies. Acquiring an appropriate data base, processing and analyzing model results, and transmitting these results at an appropriate technical, social, political, and institutional level are additional difficulties that must be addressed. This book is grounded on the premise that risks are best assessed on the basis of experimental results and sound mathematical analyses, coupled with the knowledge of experts. The carcinogenicity prediction and battery selection (ePBS) approach described herein provides a systematic mechanΒ ism-a synthesis of systems and statistical and decision analyses-to aid researchers and decision makers in the critical field of carcinogenicity prediction in selecting an appropriate battery of tests to use and in translating experimental results into information that can be used as an aid to decision making.
β¦ Table of Contents
Front Matter....Pages i-viii
Front Matter....Pages 1-1
The Carcinogenicity Prediction and Battery Selection Approach....Pages 3-14
Fundamental Basics of the CPBS Approach....Pages 15-63
Front Matter....Pages 65-66
Preliminary Analysis....Pages 67-123
Battery Selection....Pages 125-164
Risk Assessment Using Test Results....Pages 165-173
Applications of CPBS to Cancer Hazard Identification....Pages 175-202
Epilogue....Pages 203-205
Back Matter....Pages 207-211
β¦ Subjects
Waste Management/Waste Technology; Ecotoxicology; Environmental Management
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
<p>Decision making in environmental projects is typically a complex and confusing process characterized by trade-offs between socio-political, environmental, and economic impacts. Comparative Risk Assessment (CRA) is a methodology applied to facilitate decision making when various activities compete
<p>The subject of this volume--uncertainties in risk assessment and management--reflects an important theme in health, safety, and environΒ mental decision making. MOst technological hazards are characterized by substantial uncertainty. Recent examples include nuclear waste disposal, acid rain, asbe