𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Reviewing the use of antipsychotic drugs in people with intellectual disability

✍ Scribed by Giampaolo La Malfa; Stefano Lassi; Marco Bertelli; Alessandro Castellani


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2006
Tongue
English
Weight
291 KB
Volume
21
Category
Article
ISSN
0885-6222

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Introduction:

Antipsychotics are the most widely prescribed drugs in people with intellectual disability even if schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders do not affect more than 3% of such population. many authors outline the lack of studies on the efficacy of antipsychotics on schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders in people with intellectual disability.

Materials and methods:

The aim of the present study is to review all evidences resulting from international trials selected by medline, and compare efficacy and side effects of different antipsychotics in people with both intellectual disability and psychotic disorders and/or behavioural disorders.

Results:

195 studies were identified; 117 concern traditional antipychotics while 78 new generation ones. if we consider the type of studies, it results that only the 12.8% of all production is represented by meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and randomised and not controlled trials.

Conclusions:

Randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews would be the golden standard for therapeutical studies; unfortunately they are really few in this field. it is anyway significative that all the studies reported focus on the use of antipsychotics in people with intellectual disability presenting behavioural problems. to increase the validity of these studies it is recommendable to proceed only with well-designed studies, possibly double-blind versus placebo or other medications. there is need to define precise inclusion criteria, precise symptomatological or behavioural targets and adaptative ability assessment, using valid and reliable diagnostic instruments.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Prevalence of maltreatment of people wit
✍ Horner-Johnson, Willi ;Drum, Charles E. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 161 KB

## Abstract Maltreatment can have a profound adverse effect on the health of individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID). People with ID may also be more likely to experience maltreatment than other groups. Historically, data on prevalence of maltreatment among people with ID have been sparse a

Participation when using cognitive assis
✍ Birgitta Wennberg; Anette Kjellberg πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 144 KB

## Abstract The aim of the study was to describe how people with intellectual disabilities experienced their participation in everyday activities when using cognitive assistive devices. The purpose of cognitive assistive devices is to compensate for cognitive problems, to enhance independence when

Parental negotiations of the moral terra
✍ Kathryn Almack; Jennifer Clegg; Elizabeth Murphy πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 97 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract This paper draws upon parental accounts from a study of the process of transition for a cohort of 28 young people with relatively severe intellectual disabilities who left special schools in 2004 and 2005 in two adjacent English localities. This paper examines how parents negotiate thes

Socialization of people with disabilitie
✍ Mukta Kulkarni; Mark L. Lengnick-Hall πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 154 KB

## Abstract Socialization has crucial outcomes for both the employee and the employer. Through an exploratory qualitative study conducted in India, we examined how people with disabilities (PWD) viewed various aspects of their socialization process. Specifically, we looked at the role of coworkers,

Development of an imaginal provocation t
✍ John L. Taylor; Raymond W. Novaco; Claire Guinan; Nicola Street πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2004 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 108 KB

## Abstract Anger and associated aggressive behaviour are significant clinical issues for many people with intellectual disabilities (IDs) that can lead to serious constraints to their liberty, which, in turn, adversely affects their quality of life. There is some evidence to support cognitive–beha