๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Results of stoma formation for idiopathic megarectum and megacolon

โœ Scribed by G. Stabile; M. A. Kamm; P. R. Hawley; J. E. Lennard-Jones


Publisher
Springer
Year
1992
Tongue
English
Weight
277 KB
Volume
7
Category
Article
ISSN
0179-1958

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Bowel resection for idiopathic megarectum and megacolon does not always predictably relieve symptoms and has a significant morbidity. We have therefore evaluated the results of stoma formation in this condition. All patients had a bowel frequency of less than one per week, and all had a dilated rectum or colon. Eight patients, six of who had had a previous unsuccessful operation for their constipation, had a colostomy--this relieved the constipation and the need for laxatives in all six patients with rectosigmoid dilatation, although one patient could not tolerate his stoma. Two patients with dilatation of the whole colon were not helped. An ileostomy was formed in four patients with previous colonic resection, with relief of constipation in all. However pain and abdominal distension were common persistent symptoms in both groups. Four patients with a colostomy and all four patients with an ileostomy felt subjectively improved with a stoma. Stoma formation is a viable alternative to more major surgery, either as a primary procedure or after previous surgery has failed.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Results of anal or low rectal anastomosi
โœ J. Stewart; D. Kumar; Professor M. R. B. Keighley ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1994 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 308 KB

## Abstract Over a 16-year period 34 patients underwent surgery for idiopathic megarectum or megacolon; 18 had megarectum with or without megasigmoid, one megacolon only and 15 megarectum and total megacolon (nine with a previous colectomy). Ten patients underwent low rectal or anal anastomosis wit