Restricting gambling advertising and the third-person effect
β Scribed by Seounmi Youn; Ronald J. Faber; Dhavan V. Shah
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2000
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 71 KB
- Volume
- 17
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0742-6046
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Along with the rapid growth experienced by the gaming industry in the United States has come increasing calls to restrict or ban gambling advertising. To date, little is known about what motivates people to support such restrictions on advertising. However, one recent theory, the third-person effect, offers a possible explanation. The third-person effect states that when confronted with negative messages, people will overestimate the messages' effect on others relative to themselves. Additionally, it suggests that it is this misperception that motivates them to take action against such messages. This study investigates whether a third-person effect occurs for gambling advertising and if this effect is related to procensorship attitudes for lotteries and casinos. The results suggest there is a sizable gap between perceptions of the effect of gambling advertising on one's self versus others, and that the perceived effect on others is related to a willingness to restrict such advertising.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract A television content analysis and survey of 419 community respondents supports the hypothesis that media stereotypes affect public attitudes toward mental health issues. A content analysis of network, primeβtime television demonstrates that portrayals are violent, false, and negative. T
## Abstract In an experiment conducted in South Africa, we show that perceptual differences between the self and other that underlie third person effects have not only magnitude (e.g., third person effects increase as perceived selfβother differences increase), but also valence. Specifically, indiv
An experiment is reported to test Davidson's (1983) hypothesis that there is a pervasive 'third person effect' whereby people see the mass media as more likely to affect other people than it is them. Respondents were asked to judge the likely impact of three different media issues, a political campa