EU law has developed a unique and complex system under which both the Union and its Member States can act under international law, separately, jointly or in parallel. International law was not set up to deal with such complex and hybrid arrangements, which raise questions under both international an
Responsibility of the EU and the Member States under EU International Investment Protection Agreements: Between Traditional Rules, Proceduralisation and Federalisation
β Scribed by Philipp Theodor Stegmann
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Year
- 2019
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 381
- Series
- European Yearbook of International Economic Law 6
- Edition
- 1st ed.
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
This book provides a comprehensive portrait of how international responsibility of the EU and the Member States is structured under the EUβs international investment protection agreements. It analyses both the old regime as represented by the Energy Charter Treaty and the new regime as represented by the new EU investment treaties, such as CETA, TTIP, the EU-Singapore Agreement and the EU-Vietnam Agreement. The international responsibility of the EU, being a βspecialβ international organisation, is in and of itself an important and challenging topic in public international law. However, in the context of international investment law, and especially with regard to the emerging new EU investment treaties, the topic is largely unexplored and represents new terrain. The book promotes the development of law in this area and provide a springboard for further research.
The book puts forth the thesis that the determination of the EU or a Member State as respondent in a dispute under the new EU investment treaties has a substantive effect on the respondentβs international responsibility. The international law effects of the respondent determination will surely be one of the central topics in future debates on the new EU investment treaties. The book further compares the EU regulation that allocates financial burdens between the EU and the Member States arising out of international investment disputes with the only other genuinely existing allocation system in federal states to date, namely that of Germany. The book finally reveals many shortcomings of the new EU responsibility regime in international investment law and provides some suggestions on how they can best be remedied.
β¦ Table of Contents
Front Matter ....Pages i-xix
Introduction (Philipp Theodor Stegmann)....Pages 1-10
International Obligations of the EU and the Member States Under EU IIPAs (Philipp Theodor Stegmann)....Pages 11-77
International Responsibility of the EU and the Member States for Breaches of EU IIPAs Under Traditional Rules (Philipp Theodor Stegmann)....Pages 79-138
The Proceduralisation and Internalisation of International Responsibility Under Post-Lisbon Mixed IIPAs (Philipp Theodor Stegmann)....Pages 139-234
The Internal Allocation of Financial Responsibility Under the REG (Philipp Theodor Stegmann)....Pages 235-302
Specific Problems Caused by the Interrelation Between the Application of EU IIPAs and the Application of the REG (Philipp Theodor Stegmann)....Pages 303-333
Epilogue (Philipp Theodor Stegmann)....Pages 335-340
Back Matter ....Pages 341-368
β¦ Subjects
Law; European Law; International Economic Law, Trade Law; European Union Politics
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Mixed agreements are one of the most significant and complex areas of EU external relations law. They are concluded by the Member States and the EU (or the European Community in the pre-Lisbon days) with third countries and international organisations. Their negotiation, conclusion and implementatio
<p>The participation of the European Community and the Member States in the international climate change regimes is a complex issue. In the case of the Kyoto Protocol, this is rendered more complicated by the fact that, for the purposes of Article 4 of the Kyoto Protocol, the membership of the Europ
<p>The participation of the European Community and the Member States in the international climate change regimes is a complex issue. In the case of the Kyoto Protocol, this is rendered more complicated by the fact that, for the purposes of Article 4 of the Kyoto Protocol, the membership of the Europ
<p><p>The topic of this book is the participation of the EU in international dispute settlement. It aims to</p><p>provide the reader with an appraisal of the most problematic aspects connected with the participation</p><p>of a sui generis legal subject such as the EU to international dispute settlem
<p><span>EU law has developed a unique and complex system under which the Union and its Member States can both act under international law, separately, jointly or in parallel. International law was not set up to deal with such complex and hybrid arrangements, which raise questions under both interna