✦ LIBER ✦

Response to Wexler

✍ Scribed by Rachel Sharp

Publisher: Springer
Year: 1982
Tongue: English
Weight: 867 KB
Volume: 13
Category: Article
ISSN: 0826-4805
DOI: 10.1007/bf01807949

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

In memoriam: Philip Wexler, Ed.D.

✍ RHV 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 72 KB

Elena Wexler-Kreindler (1931–1992) in Me

Elena Wexler-Kreindler (1931–1992) in Memoriam

📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 148 KB

Response to the Responses

✍ Gary B. Mesibov 📂 Article 📅 1976 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 268 KB

RESPONSE TO DISCUSSION

✍ IGUSA, T. 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 64 KB 👁 1 views

The paper' addresses the following two questions: (1) When is it necessary to include the effects of non-classical damping? (2) How can the SRSS and CQC methods be generalized to include these effects? It was shown that, in the context of mode combination analysis, Warburton and Soni's parameter'

Response to Ahlgren

✍ William B. Stanley; Nancy W. Brickhouse 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 92 KB

We appreciate Ahlgren's interest in our article and are pleased to see that there is probably as much agreement between us as there are differences. The disagreement between our position and Science for All Americans (SFAA, 1990) has to do wirh what is meant by "cultural bias." In our article we dis

Response to Coffman

✍ Ana M. Soto; Carlos Sonnenschein 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 36 KB

We welcome Coffman's comments on our article. He makes two main points: on the one hand, he recognizes that reductionistic tendencies have gone too far in explaining development at large and carcinogenesis, in particular. On the other hand, he cleverly raises doubts about the validity of the critici