✦ LIBER ✦

Response to the Comments of Dr. Zheng

✍ Scribed by Suresh H. Moolgavkar and E. Georg Luebeck

Book ID: 124673749
Publisher: Bioone
Year: 1999
Tongue: English
Weight: 399 KB
Volume: 151
Category: Article
ISSN: 0033-7587
DOI: 10.2307/3579756

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Response to the Comments of Dr. Kempner

✍ N. Berovic, D. G. Lidzey, R. S. Chittock, T. D. Beynon, C. W. Wharton, J. B. Jac 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 Bioone 🌐 English ⚖ 366 KB

Response to Dr. Noubactep's comments

✍ Fasheng Li 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 57 KB

Response to Dr Knott's comments

✍ R. N. Sawhney 📂 Article 📅 1981 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 114 KB

Response to Dr Frazier's comments

✍ Harold Zirin 📂 Article 📅 1972 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 191 KB

Frazier (1972) criticized the conclusions of Veeder and Zirin (1970) and of Foukal (1971) on the relation of chromospheric morphology to magnetic fields. No sooner was this answered by Foukal and myself (Foukal and Zirin, 1972) when a second, more strident criticism by Frazier (directly preceding

Response to Dr. M. Castañs comments

✍ S.M. Jeter 📂 Article 📅 1983 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 97 KB

Response to Dr. Oleson's comments

✍ Daniel S. Kapp; Todd A. Barnett; Richard S. Cox; Eric R. Lee; Allen Lohrbach; Pe 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 141 KB