✦ LIBER ✦

Response to the comment by R. Cornells and B. Wallaeys

✍ Scribed by Locatelli, Clinio ;Fagioli, Francesco

Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Year: 1989
Weight: 126 KB
Volume: 97
Category: Article
ISSN: 0344-838X
DOI: 10.1007/bf01197290

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Response to the comment by C. Locatelli

Response to the comment by C. Locatelli and F. Fagioli

✍ Cornelis, Rita ;Wallaeys, Bart 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 Springer-Verlag ⚖ 102 KB

Response to the comments by Simmons and

Response to the comments by Simmons and Taylor

✍ M. Meyyappan; J.P. Kreskovsky; H.L. Grubin 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 61 KB

Author's reply to comments by F. Mato an

Author's reply to comments by F. Mato and R.B. Mato

✍ Jaime Wisniak 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 32 KB

Response to the comment by M. Jensen et

Response to the comment by M. Jensen et al

✍ Jorma Toppari; Helena E. Virtanen; Tina K. Jensen; Katharina M. Main; Niels E. S 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 38 KB 👁 1 views

Response to the comments by P. Bopp and

Response to the comments by P. Bopp and M. Wolfsberg

✍ Bruce B. Benson; Daniel Krause; Robert H. Romer; Henry S. Frank; Wen-Yang Wen 📂 Article 📅 1981 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 93 KB

Response to R. H. Essenhigh, “A comment

Response to R. H. Essenhigh, “A comment on the definition of ignition used by Lermant and Yip”

✍ Jean-Claude Lermant; Sidney Yip 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 61 KB

We believe that confusion has been generated by the way we discussed our concepts of criticality and ignition. The cause of this confusion is the paragraph in our paper [1] that contains Eq. ( ). The word "ignition" was used just before the equation, whereas we should have used instead the word "cri