✦ LIBER ✦

Response to Selection Under Non-Random Mating II. Prediction

✍ Scribed by K. Muralidharan; J. P. Jain; Dr. J. P. Jain

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1992
Tongue: English
Weight: 196 KB
Volume: 34
Category: Article
ISSN: 0323-3847
DOI: 10.1002/bimj.4710340511

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Gene Flow Technique for Response to Sele

Gene Flow Technique for Response to Selection under Non-Random Mating

✍ K. Muralidharan; Dr. J. P. Jain 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 368 KB 👁 1 views

Response to Selection Under Non-Random M

Response to Selection Under Non-Random Mating I. Partitioning Genetic Variance

✍ K. Muralidharan; Dr. J. P. Jain 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 267 KB 👁 2 views

Prediction of Response to Selection and

Prediction of Response to Selection and Inbreeding Coefficient under Assortative Mating

✍ Dr. T. Nomura 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 562 KB

A Note on Response to Selection in Non-R

A Note on Response to Selection in Non-Random Mating Populations

✍ Dr. T. Nomura 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 254 KB 👁 2 views

Predicting Response to Selection on a Qu

Predicting Response to Selection on a Quantitative Trait: A Comparison between Models for Mixed-mating Populations

✍ JOHN K. KELLY; SCOTT WILLIAMSON 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 258 KB

Two di!erent theoretical frameworks have been developed to predict response to selection in a mixed mating population (in which reproduction occurs by a mixture of outcrossing and self-fertilization). The genotypic covariance model (GCM) and the structured linear model (SLM) rely on the same assumpt