✦ LIBER ✦

Response to our critics

✍ Scribed by William B. Stanley; Nancy W. Brickhouse

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 2000
Tongue: English
Weight: 18 KB
Volume: 85
Category: Article
ISSN: 0097-0352
DOI: 10.1002/1098-237x(200101)85:1<87::aid-sce12>3.0.co;2-i

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

✍ Peter J. Richerson; Robert Boyd 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 180 KB

Response to Critics

✍ Larry Alexander; Kimberly Kessler Ferzan 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 174 KB

Response to critics

✍ Jack Lyons 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 160 KB

A response to my critics

✍ Fred Dallmayr 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 551 KB

Misreading status as class: A reply to o

Misreading status as class: A reply to our critics

✍ Jan Pakulski; Malcolm Waters 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 342 KB

Within these three moderate and fair-minded critiques of our essay, a central criticism concerns the accuracy of our portrayal of the class paradigm. This is partly an empirical question, and partly a matter of semantics. The summary propositions are derived from the class literature with the intent

Generic and therapeutic substitution: a

Generic and therapeutic substitution: a response to our critic

✍ Mubarak Nasser Al Ameri; Miran Epstein; Atholl Johnston 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 96 KB