✦ LIBER ✦

Response to oleson

✍ Scribed by Helen Fosmire; Kullervo Hynynen

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1993
Tongue: English
Weight: 173 KB
Volume: 26
Category: Article
ISSN: 0360-3016
DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90223-i

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Response to Dr. Oleson

✍ Daniel S. Kapp 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 170 KB

Response to Dr. Oleson's comments

✍ Daniel S. Kapp; Todd A. Barnett; Richard S. Cox; Eric R. Lee; Allen Lohrbach; Pe 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 141 KB

Olaf Martin Oleson

📂 Article 📅 1929 🏛 Elsevier ⚖ 508 KB

RESPONSE TO DISCUSSION

✍ IGUSA, T. 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 64 KB 👁 1 views

The paper' addresses the following two questions: (1) When is it necessary to include the effects of non-classical damping? (2) How can the SRSS and CQC methods be generalized to include these effects? It was shown that, in the context of mode combination analysis, Warburton and Soni's parameter'

Response to Ahlgren

✍ William B. Stanley; Nancy W. Brickhouse 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 92 KB

We appreciate Ahlgren's interest in our article and are pleased to see that there is probably as much agreement between us as there are differences. The disagreement between our position and Science for All Americans (SFAA, 1990) has to do wirh what is meant by "cultural bias." In our article we dis

Response to Coffman

✍ Ana M. Soto; Carlos Sonnenschein 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 36 KB

We welcome Coffman's comments on our article. He makes two main points: on the one hand, he recognizes that reductionistic tendencies have gone too far in explaining development at large and carcinogenesis, in particular. On the other hand, he cleverly raises doubts about the validity of the critici