๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Response to Lindesay

โœ Scribed by P. J. Connelly; C. Rodriguez-Castello; L. M. Robertson


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2005
Tongue
English
Weight
19 KB
Volume
20
Category
Article
ISSN
0885-6230

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Dear Editor

I enjoyed this account of an unusual delusional disorder. However, when uncommon syndromes such as this are given a literary label, the usual practice is to name them after the character affected (e.g. Othello, Muchausen, etc.). In this case, therefore, the proper term would be 'Penelope syndrome'.

REFERENCE


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


RESPONSE TO DISCUSSION
โœ IGUSA, T. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 64 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

The paper' addresses the following two questions: (1) When is it necessary to include the effects of non-classical damping? (2) How can the SRSS and CQC methods be generalized to include these effects? It was shown that, in the context of mode combination analysis, Warburton and Soni's parameter'

Response to Ahlgren
โœ William B. Stanley; Nancy W. Brickhouse ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 92 KB

We appreciate Ahlgren's interest in our article and are pleased to see that there is probably as much agreement between us as there are differences. The disagreement between our position and Science for All Americans (SFAA, 1990) has to do wirh what is meant by "cultural bias." In our article we dis

Response to Coffman
โœ Ana M. Soto; Carlos Sonnenschein ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2005 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 36 KB

We welcome Coffman's comments on our article. He makes two main points: on the one hand, he recognizes that reductionistic tendencies have gone too far in explaining development at large and carcinogenesis, in particular. On the other hand, he cleverly raises doubts about the validity of the critici

Response to Muresian
โœ Professor B. Singh ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2006 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 28 KB
Response to Shmueli
โœ Katherine Stevens; Christopher McCabe; John Brazier ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 71 KB

In this issue, Shmueli has commented on our short letter previously published in this journal (Stevens et al., 2006) in which we replicated the analysis of Torrance et al. (1996) in estimating a relationship between visual analogue scale (VAS) and standard gamble (SG) based on the power curve relati

Response to critiques
โœ Charles A. Nelson ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 52 KB