✦ LIBER ✦

Response to letter to the editor by Mr. Mark Barash

✍ Scribed by Dan Frumkin; Adam Wasserstrom

Book ID: 118447710
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2011
Tongue: English
Weight: 69 KB
Volume: 5
Category: Article
ISSN: 1872-4973
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.12.010

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Response to Mark Foster's Letter to the

Response to Mark Foster's Letter to the Editor

✍ Andrew K. Simpson; Jonathan Grauer 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 59 KB

LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Response to Letter

LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Response to Letter to the Editor by Zucchi

✍ A Cave; P Garlick 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 54 KB

Response to the Letter to the Editor

✍ Mark A. Flückiger 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 6 KB

Response to Letter to the Editor

✍ Bischoff, Helge G.; Heigener, David F.; Walzer, Stefan; Nuijten, Mark 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 46 KB

Response to Letter to the Editor

✍ Roongroj Bhidayasiri; Jeff M. Bronstein; Mark S. Cohen; Frank G. Shellock 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 48 KB

Response to Guth's letter to the editor

✍ Mark D. Fairchild 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 40 KB 👁 2 views

I was surprised that, in their study of the number of dis- The authors are grateful to Cal McCamy for his timely cernible colors, Pointer and Attridge 1 missed the early response to their original article. Neither they, nor the work and the classic derivation by Nickerson and others they contacted,